| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
ANIMAL GENETICS |
Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211
3 Correspondence: 159 Animal Sciences Center, 920 East Campus Dr. (phone: 573-882-8234; fax: 573-884-7827; e-mail: LambersonW{at}missouri.edu).
The objectives of this study were to estimate response to divergent selection for an index of placental efficiency in swine, and to evaluate the effect of placental efficiency on litter size. The selection index (SI) included total born (TB), birth weight (BRWT), and placental weight (PW), and was designed to increase in the high line (H) or decrease in the low line (L) the efficiency of the placental function (PE), defined as the ratio BRWT:PW. (Co)variance components were estimated for direct and maternal additive effects by using an animal model with MTDFREML procedures. Estimated breeding values were calculated by using records on individual BRWT (n = 2,111), PW (n = 2,006), PE (n = 1,677), and SI (n = 1,677). Litter traits were evaluated using records on 193 litters. The model included the fixed effects of contemporary group for all traits, with the addition of sex for individual traits and parity for litter traits. Litter was fitted as an uncorrelated random effect for all traits, and TB was used as a linear and quadratic covariate for BRWT, PW, and PE. Direct heritability estimates from single-trait models were 0.03, 0.25, 0.18, 0.11, and 0.08 for BRWT, PW, PE, SI, and TB, respectively. Estimated breeding values were compared between lines by using a model including generation, line within generation, and replicate within line as the error term. Estimates of genetic divergence were 20.7 ± 2.7 g, 0.24 ± 0.03, 0.11 ± 0.02, and 0.07 ± 0.02 per generation for PW, PE, SI, and TB, respectively (P < 0.01), but divergence was not significant for BRWT. At Generation 4, direct EBV was higher in L than in H for PW (55.9 ± 8.7 vs. –24.2 ± 9.5 g, respectively; P< 0.01) and higher in H than in L for PE (0.58 ± 0.10 vs. –0.35 ± 0.09 g, respectively; P < 0.01). However, EBV was not different for BRWT, SI, or TB. These results indicate that PW and PE are susceptible to change by genetic selection; however, the correlated response in TB was an unexpected genetic trend toward a higher TB in L of 0.05 ± 0.01 piglets per generation (P < 0.01).
Key Words: Genetic Parameters • Pigs • Placental Efficiency • Selection
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Rosendo, L. Canario, T. Druet, J. Gogue, and J. P. Bidanel Correlated responses of pre- and postweaning growth and backfat thickness to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3209 - 3217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Vallet and B. A. Freking Differences in placental structure during gestation associated with large and small pig fetuses J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3267 - 3275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. A. Freking, K. A. Leymaster, J. L. Vallet, and R. K. Christenson Number of fetuses and conceptus growth throughout gestation in lines of pigs selected for ovulation rate or uterine capacity J Anim Sci, September 1, 2007; 85(9): 2093 - 2103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Rosendo, T. Druet, J. Gogue, L. Canario, and J. P. Bidanel Correlated responses for litter traits to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs J Anim Sci, July 1, 2007; 85(7): 1615 - 1624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Rosendo, T. Druet, J. Gogue, and J. P. Bidanel Direct responses to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in Large White pigs J Anim Sci, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 356 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Mesa, T. J. Safranski, K. M. Cammack, R. L. Weaber, and W. R. Lamberson Genetic and phenotypic relationships of farrowing and weaning survival to birth and placental weights in pigs J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 32 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
