HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Iwaisaki, H. Articles by Bertrand, J. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Iwaisaki, H. Articles by Bertrand, J. K.

Genetic parameters estimated with multitrait and linear spline-random regression models using Gelbvieh early growth data¹

H. Iwaisaki^*,2, S. Tsuruta^,3, I. Misztal and J. K. Bertrand

^* Department of Agro-biology, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan; and and Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens 30602-2771

³ Correspondence—phone: 706-583-0017; fax: 706-583-0274; e-mail: shogo{at}uga.edu.

Estimates of direct and maternal genetic parameters in beef cattle were obtained with a random regression model with a linear spline function (SFM) and were compared with those obtained by a multitrait model (MTM). Weight data of 18,900 Gelbvieh calves were used, of which 100, 75, and 17% had birth (BWT), weaning (WWT), and yearling (YWT) weights, respectively. The MTM analysis was conducted with a three-trait maternal animal model. The MTM included an overall linear partial fixed regression on age at recording for WWT and YWT, and direct-maternal genetic and maternal permanent environmental effects. The SFM included the same effects as MTM, plus a direct permanent environmental effect and heterogeneous residual variance. Three knots, or breakpoints, were set to 1, 205, and 365 d. (Co)variance components in both models were estimated with a Bayesian implementation via Gibbs sampling using flat priors. Because BWT had no variability of age at recording, there was good agreement between corresponding components of variance estimated from both models. For WWT and YWT, with the exception of the sum of direct permanent environmental and residual variances, there was a general tendency for SFM estimates of variances to be lower than MTM estimates. Direct and maternal heritability estimates with SFM tended to be lower than those estimated with MTM. For example, the direct heritability for YWT was 0.59 with MTM, and 0.48 with SFM. Estimated genetic correlations for direct and maternal effects with SFM were less negative than those with MTM. For example, the direct-maternal correlation for WWT was –0.43 with MTM and –0.33 with SFM. Estimates with SFM may be superior to MTM due to better modeling of age in both fixed and random effects.

Key Words: Beef Cattle • Early Growth • Genetic Parameters • Linear Spline Function • Random Regression

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Sanchez, I. Misztal, I. Aguilar, and J. K. Bertrand Genetic evaluation of growth in a multibreed beef cattle population using random regression-linear spline models J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 267 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Kohn, A. R. Sharifi, S. Malovrh, and H. Simianer Estimation of genetic parameters for body weight of the Goettingen minipig with random regression models J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2423 - 2428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. C. Cantet, A. N. Birchmeier, A. W. C. Cayo, and C. Fioretti Semiparametric animal models via penalized splines as alternatives to models with contemporary groups J Anim Sci, November 1, 2005; 83(11): 2482 - 2494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]