J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kephart, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Mills, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kephart, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Mills, E. W.
J. Anim. Sci. 2005. 83:715-721
© 2005 American Society of Animal Science

ANIMAL PRODUCTION

Effect of withholding feed from swine before slaughter on carcass and viscera weights and meat quality1

K. B. Kephart2 and E. W. Mills

Department of Dairy and Animal Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802

2 Correspondence: 306 ASI Building (phone: 814-863-3671; fax: 814-865-7442; e-mail: kbk2{at}psu.edu).

Two experiments were conducted to determine the effect of feed withholding on carcass and viscera weights and meat quality in grow-finish swine. Experiment 1 included 528 pigs that were marketed from 24 pens and subjected to either 6 (control) or 24 h of feed withholding before marketing. Experiment 2 included 324 pigs that were marketed from 36 pens that were subjected to 6 (control), 16, or 24 h of feed withholding before marketing. In both experiments, pigs from each pen were marketed over a 14-d period in three groups, each 7 d apart. In Exp. 1, withholding feed for 24 h decreased viscera weight, carcass weight and yield, and feed intake during the 14-d marketing period compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Subjective measures of color, firmness, and marbling in fresh pork did not differ for the two treatment groups. In Exp. 2, withholding feed for 16 or 24 h decreased (P < 0.05) viscera weight compared with that of the control group. Withholding feed for 24 h decreased feed intake during the 14-d marketing period compared with intake of the control group. Withholding feed for 16 h did not decrease carcass weight, but carcass weights in the 24-h group were lower than those of the 16-h group in this Exp. 2 (P < 0.05). Color, firmness, marbling, and shear force did not differ among treatment groups in Exp. 2; however, cooking loss in pork from the control group exceeded that of the 24-h treatment. Gain:feed and ADG were not affected by treatment during the marketing period in either experiment. We conclude that withholding feed for either 16 or 24 h decreases viscera weight and feed intake during the marketing phase in finishing swine. These changes could potentially benefit both the producer and the processor with only minimal effects on carcass weight and pork quality.

Key Words: Carcass Weight • Feed • Meat Quality • Swine • Viscera • Withdrawal






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Animal Science.