J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beauchemin, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by McGinn, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beauchemin, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by McGinn, S. M.
J. Anim. Sci. 2005. 83:653-661
© 2005 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL NUTRITION

Methane emissions from feedlot cattle fed barley or corn diets1

K. A. Beauchemin2 and S. M. McGinn

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada

2 Correspondence: Box 3000, 5403 1st Ave. South (phone: 403-327-4561; fax: 403-317-2182; e-mail: beauchemin{at}agr.gc.ca).

Methane emitted from the livestock sector contributes to greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. Understanding the variability in enteric methane production related to diet is essential to decreasing uncertainty in greenhouse gas emission inventories and to identifying viable greenhouse gas reduction strategies. Our study focused on measuring methane in growing beef cattle fed corn- or barley-based diets typical of those fed to cattle in North American feedlots. The experiment was designed as a randomized complete block (group) design with two treatments, barley and corn. Angus heifer calves (initial BW = 328 kg) were allocated to two groups (eight per group), with four cattle in each group fed a corn or barley diet. The experiment was conducted over a 42-d backgrounding phase, a 35-d transition phase and a 32-d finishing phase. Backgrounding diets consisted of 70% barley silage or corn silage and 30% concentrate containing steam-rolled barley or dry-rolled corn (DM basis). Finishing diets consisted of 9% barley silage and 91% concentrate containing barley or corn (DM basis). All diets contained monensin (33 mg/kg of DM). Cattle were placed into four large environmental chambers (two heifers per chamber) during each phase to measure enteric methane production for 3 d. During the backgrounding phase, DMI was greater by cattle fed corn than for those fed barley (10.2 vs. 7.6 kg/d, P < 0.01), but during the finishing phase, DMI was similar for both diets (8.3 kg/d). The DMI was decreased to 6.3 kg/d with no effect of diet or phase while the cattle were in the chambers; thus, methane emissions (g/d) reported may underestimate those of the feedlot industry. Methane emissions per kilogram of DMI and as a percentage of GE intake were not affected by grain source during the backgrounding phase (24.6 g/kg of DMI; 7.42% of GE), but were less (P < 0.05) for corn than for barley during the finishing phase (9.2 vs. 13.1 g/kg of DMI; 2.81 vs. 4.03% of GE). The results indicate the need to implement dietary strategies to decrease methane emissions of cattle fed high-forage backgrounding diets and barley-based finishing diets. Mitigating methane losses from cattle will have long-term environmental benefits by decreasing agriculture’s contribution to greenhouse gas emissions.

Key Words: Barley • Beef Cattle • Carbon Dioxide • Corn • Greenhouse Gases • Methane




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
D. W. T. Griffith, G. R. Bryant, D. Hsu, and A. R. Reisinger
Methane emissions from free-ranging cattle: comparison of tracer and integrated horizontal flux techniques.
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 582 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
G. Fonty, K. Joblin, M. Chavarot, R. Roux, G. Naylor, and F. Michallon
Establishment and Development of Ruminal Hydrogenotrophs in Methanogen-Free Lambs
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., October 15, 2007; 73(20): 6391 - 6403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. A. Beauchemin, S. M. McGinn, T. F. Martinez, and T. A. McAllister
Use of condensed tannin extract from quebracho trees to reduce methane emissions from cattle
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 1990 - 1996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
A.-D. G. Wright, C. H. Auckland, and D. H. Lynn
Molecular Diversity of Methanogens in Feedlot Cattle from Ontario and Prince Edward Island, Canada
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 2007; 73(13): 4206 - 4210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. L. Ellis, E. Kebreab, N. E. Odongo, B. W. McBride, E. K. Okine, and J. France
Prediction of Methane Production from Dairy and Beef Cattle
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3456 - 3466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. N. Miller, E. D. Berry, J. E. Wells, C. L. Ferrell, S. L. Archibeque, and H. C. Freetly
Influence of genotype and diet on steer performance, manure odor, and carriage of pathogenic and other fecal bacteria. III. Odorous compound production
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2533 - 2545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
S. M. McGinn, K. A. Beauchemin, A. D. Iwaasa, and T. A. McAllister
Assessment of the Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) Tracer Technique for Measuring Enteric Methane Emissions from Cattle
J. Environ. Qual., August 9, 2006; 35(5): 1686 - 1691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. A. Beauchemin and S. M. McGinn
Methane emissions from beef cattle: Effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2006; 84(6): 1489 - 1496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Animal Science.