J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Appleby, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Appleby, M. C.
J. Anim. Sci. 2005. 83:E9-E12
© 2005 American Society of Animal Science

The relationship between food prices and animal welfare1

M. C. Appleby2

The Humane Society of the United States, Washington, DC 20037

2 Correspondence: World Society for the Protection of Animals, 89 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7TP, U.K. (phone: +44 20 7587 5000; fax: +44 20 7793 0208; e-mail: michaelappleby{at}wspa.org.uk).

The proportion of income spent on food has been in steady decline. Most people could readily pay more for food. Indeed, most consumers already pay more than necessary by buying specialized products or convenience foods. But there are costs associated with cheap food produced from animals that reach well beyond the dollars paid by citizens at the checkout register of a supermarket or fast-food restaurant. A morally significant effect of pressure for cheap food production has been modifications to production methods that may have effects on animal welfare (e.g., by decreased space allowances). Cheaper food for humans sometimes involves greater pain and suffering for food animals; however, improvements, possibly even major improvements, in welfare could be achieved with only small increases in price to the consumer. The obstacle to change is in part economic inertia; producers resist change because buyers expect low prices. Deployment of public subsidies and gradual change could avoid these short-term effects, although protection is needed against imports from countries with even lower welfare consideration and environmental standards. From the viewpoint of doing what is appropriate for animal welfare and the environment, free-market competition should no longer be the sole determinant of food prices. Animal scientists can serve the long-term interests of animal agriculture by combining efforts to do the right thing for the welfare of animals with more traditional goals, such as increasing production efficiency.

Key Words: Animal Welfare • Competition • Consumers • Economics • Food Prices • Retail




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
F. Napolitano, C. Pacelli, A. Girolami, and A. Braghieri
Effect of Information About Animal Welfare on Consumer Willingness to Pay for Yogurt
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2008; 91(3): 910 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. C. Swanson
The Ethical Aspects of Regulating Production
Poult. Sci., February 1, 2008; 87(2): 373 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Animal Science.