J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bengochea, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Soto-Navarro, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bengochea, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Soto-Navarro, S. A.
J. Anim. Sci. 2005. 83:2815-2825
© 2005 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL NUTRITION

Effect of grain processing degree on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and performance characteristics of steers fed medium-concentrate growing diets1

W. L. Bengochea, G. P. Lardy2, M. L. Bauer and S. A. Soto-Navarro3

Department of Animal and Range Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105

2 Correspondence: 100 Hultz Hall (phone: 701-231-7660; fax: 701-231-7590; e-mail: glardy{at}ndsuext.nodak.edu).

Three trials were conducted to evaluate the effects of degree of barley and corn processing on performance and digestion characteristics of steers fed growing diets. Trial 1 used 14 (328 ± 43 kg initial BW) Holstein steers fitted with ruminal, duodenal, and ileal cannulas in a completely randomized design to evaluate intake, site of digestion, and ruminal fermentation. Treatments consisted of coarsely rolled barley (2,770 µm), moderately rolled barley (2,127 µm), and finely rolled barley (1,385 µm). Trial 2 used 141 crossbred beef steers (319 ± 5.5 kg initial BW; 441 ± 5.5 kg final BW) fed for 84 d in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement to evaluate the effects of grain source (barley or corn) and extent of processing (coarse or fine) on steer performance. Trial 3 investigated four degrees of grain processing in barley-based growing diets and used 143 crossbred steers (277 ± 19 kg initial BW; 396 ± 19 kg final BW) fed for 93 d. Treatments were coarsely, moderately, and finely rolled barley and a mixture of coarsely and finely rolled barley to approximate moderately rolled barley. In Trial 1, total tract digestibilities of OM, CP, NDF, and ADF were not affected (P ≥ 0.10) by barley processing; however, total tract starch digestibility increased linearly (P < 0.05), and fecal starch output decreased linearly (P < 0.05) with finer barley processing. In situ DM, CP, starch disappearance rate, starch soluble fraction, and extent of starch digestion increased linearly (P < 0.05) with finer processing. In Trial 2, final BW and ADG were not affected by degree of processing or type of grain (P ≥ 0.13). Steers fed corn had greater DMI (P = 0.05) than those fed barley. In Trial 3, DMI decreased linearly with finer degree of processing (P = 0.003). Gain efficiency, apparent dietary NEm, and apparent dietary NEg increased (P < 0.001) with increased degree of processing. Finer processing of barley improved characteristics of starch digestion and feed efficiency, but finer processing of corn did not improve animal performance in medium-concentrate, growing diets.

Key Words: Barley • Corn • Digestion • Particle Size • Processing • Steer




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. S. Allen, B. J. Bradford, and M. Oba
BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: The hepatic oxidation theory of the control of feed intake and its application to ruminants
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2009; 87(10): 3317 - 3334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. C. Marini, D. G. Fox, and M. R. Murphy
Nitrogen transactions along the gastrointestinal tract of cattle: A meta-analytical approach
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(3): 660 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Animal Science.