| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
ANIMAL GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTION |
Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman 59717
2 Correspondence—phone: 406-994-5574; fax: 406-994-5589; e-mail: jgb{at}montana.edu.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of bull excretory products on the resumption of postpartum luteal function in primiparous, restricted-suckled cows. Hypotheses tested were that resumption of luteal function or proportions of cows that initiate luteal cycling did not differ among cows exposed to a bull (BE), exposed to excretory products of bulls (EPB), not exposed to a bull (NE), or exposed to excretory products of cows (EPC). Two-year-old Angus x Hereford cows were assigned 35 d after calving to one of the four treatments (n = 15, 16, 16, and 15 for BE, EPB, NE, and EPC, respectively). Cows in the EPB and EPC treatments were placed in enclosures for 10 to 12 h, between 1830 and 0800 daily. Each enclosure was occupied by bulls (EPB) or left empty (EPC) for 10 to 12 h (0800 to 1830) daily. All cows were restricted to suckling twice daily (0800 and 1800) beginning on d 0. Blood samples were obtained from each cow on d –1 and every third day of the study thereafter. An increase in progesterone concentrations in three consecutive samples that exceeded 1.0 ng/mL was used as evidence of resumption of luteal function. Interval from d 0 to resumption of luteal activity was less for (P < 0.05) BE and EPB cows than for NE cows, but did not differ between BE and EPB cows. Interval for EPC cows did not differ from that for NE cows; however, interval for EPC cows was greater (P = 0.06) than that for BE cows and was longer (P < 0.05) than that of EPB cows. Proportions of cows that resumed luteal function by d 40 and 50 did not differ between NE and EPC cows; however, proportions of EPB and BE cows that resumed luteal function were greater (P < 0.05) than those for NE and EPC cows by d 40 and 50. Proportions of cows that resumed luteal function by d 70 were greater (P < 0.05) for BE, EPB, and EPC cows than for NE cows; however, proportions of BE and EPC cows did not differ. The proportion of EPB cows that resumed luteal function was greater (P = 0.058) than that of EPC cows, but the proportion of BE cows that resumed luteal function did not differ from that of EPC cows by d 70. We conclude that exposing primiparous restricted-suckled cows to excretory products of bulls or crowding estrus-cycling cows in an enclosure hastened postpartum resumption of luteal function. Therefore, the biostimulatory role of bulls and the crowding effect of cows seem to be mediated by a pheromone (or pheremones) present in their excretory products.
Key Words: Biostimulation • Bovine • Bulls • Pheromone • Postpartum Interval
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. A. Tauck and J. G. Berardinelli Putative urinary pheromone of bulls involved with breeding performance of primiparous beef cows in a progestin-based estrous synchronization protocol J Anim Sci, July 1, 2007; 85(7): 1669 - 1674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. G. Berardinelli, P. S. Joshi, and S. A. Tauck Conception rates to artificial insemination in primiparous, suckled cows exposed to the biostimulatory effect of bulls before and during a gonadotropin-releasing hormone-based estrus synchronization protocol J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 848 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
