J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stein, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Peters, D. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stein, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Peters, D. N.
J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:2568-2578
© 2004 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL NUTRITION

Assessment of the feeding value of South Dakota-grown field peas (Pisum sativum L.) for growing pigs1,2

H. H. Stein3, G. Benzoni4, R. A. Bohlke5 and D. N. Peters

Department of Animal and Range Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007

3 Correspondence: Box 2170 (phone: 605-688-5434; fax: 605-688-6170; e-mail: hans_stein{at}sdstate.edu).

Four experiments were conducted to investigate the feeding value of South Dakota-grown field peas (Pisum sativum L.) for growing pigs. In Exp. 1, 96 pigs (initial BW = 22 ± 3.35 kg) were allotted to four treatment groups (four pigs per pen, six replicate pens per treatment) and fed growing (0.95% Lys) and finishing (0.68% Lys) diets containing 0, 12, 24, or 36% field peas (as-fed basis). There were no differences among the treatment groups in ADG, ADFI, or G:F. Likewise, there were no differences in backfat thickness or lean meat percent among treatment groups, but pigs fed diets containing 12, 24, or 36% field peas had greater (P < 0.05) loin depths than pigs fed the control diet. In Exp. 2, 120 pigs (initial BW = 7.8 ± 1.04 kg) were allotted to four treatment groups 2 wk after weaning. Pigs were then fed diets containing 0, 6, 12, or 18% field peas (as-fed basis) during the following 4 wk. There were five pigs per pen and six replicate pens per treatment. Results of the experiment showed no differences in ADG, ADFI, or G:F among treatment groups. In Exp. 3, apparent (AID) and standardized (SID) ileal digestibility coefficients of CP and AA in field peas and soybean meal were measured using six individually penned growing pigs (initial BW = 36.5 ± 2.1 kg) arranged in a repeated 3 x 3 Latin square design. The AID for Met, Trp, Cys, and Ser, and the SID for Met, Trp, and Cys were lower (P < 0.05) in field peas than in soybean meal; but for CP and all other AA, no differences in AID or SID were observed between the two feed ingredients. Experiment 4 was an energy balance experiment conducted to measure the DE and ME concentrations in field peas and corn. Six growing pigs (initial BW = 85.5 ± 6.5 kg) were placed in metabolism cages and fed diets based on field peas or corn and arranged in a two-period switch-back design. The DE values for field peas and corn (3,864 and 3,879 kcal/kg DM, respectively) were similar, but the ME of corn was higher (P < 0.05) than the ME of field peas (3,825 vs. 3,741 kcal ME/kg DM). The results from the current experiments demonstrate that the nutrients in South Dakota-grown field peas are highly digestible by growing pigs. Therefore, such field peas may be included in diets for nursery pigs and growing-finishing pigs in amounts of at least 18 and 36%, respectively, without negatively affecting pig performance.

Key Words: Amino acids • Digestibility • Energy • Field Peas • Pigs




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. G. Kim, G. I. Petersen, R. B. Hinson, G. L. Allee, and H. H. Stein
Amino acid digestibility and energy concentration in a novel source of high-protein distillers dried grains and their effects on growth performance of pigs
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2009; 87(12): 4013 - 4021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. M. Baker and H. H. Stein
Amino acid digestibility and concentration of digestible and metabolizable energy in soybean meal produced from conventional, high-protein, or low-oligosaccharide varieties of soybeans and fed to growing pigs
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2009; 87(7): 2282 - 2290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
K. R. Brooks, B. R. Wiegand, A. L. Meteer, G. I. Petersen, J. D. Spencer, J. R. Winter, and J. A. Robb
Inclusion of Yellow Field Peas and Carbohydrase Enzyme in Nursery Pig Diets to Improve Growth Performance
Professional Animal Scientist, February 1, 2009; 25(1): 17 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. Pedersen, M. G. Boersma, and H. H. Stein
Energy and nutrient digestibility in NutriDense corn and other cereal grains fed to growing pigs
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2473 - 2483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
H. H. Stein and R. A. Bohlke
The effects of thermal treatment of field peas (Pisum sativum L.) on nutrient and energy digestibility by growing pigs
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1424 - 1431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. Pedersen, M. G. Boersma, and H. H. Stein
Digestibility of energy and phosphorus in ten samples of distillers dried grains with solubles fed to growing pigs
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1168 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
H. H Stein, A. K. R. Everts, K. K. Sweeter, D. N. Peters, R. J. Maddock, D. M. Wulf, and C. Pedersen
The influence of dietary field peas (Pisum sativum L.) on pig performance, carcass quality, and the palatability of pork
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2006; 84(11): 3110 - 3117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. O. Gottlob, J. M. DeRouchey, M. D. Tokach, R. D. Goodband, S. S. Dritz, J. L. Nelssen, C. W. Hastad, and D. A. Knabe
Amino acid and energy digestibility of protein sources for growing pigs
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2006; 84(6): 1396 - 1402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Animal Science.