|
|
||||||||
ANIMAL PRODUCTION |
Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908
2 Correspondence: Haskell Agricultural Laboratory, 57905 866 Road, Concord, NE 68728 (phone: 402-584-2812; fax: 402-584-2859; e-mail: tmader{at}unlnotes.unl.edu).
Angus x crossbred heifers (270 per trial) were used in an experiment conducted over one 105-d summer and one 104-d winter feeding period. Treatments were identical for each trial and included: 1) control, 2) estrogenic implant (E), 3) trenbolone acetate implant (TBA), 4) E + TBA (ET), 5) melengestrol acetate (MGA) in the feed, and 6) ET + MGA (ETM). Each treatment was replicated in five pens, with nine heifers per pen in each season. Initial weights (mean = 384 kg, SE = 57) were the same for each season. There were no treatment x season interactions for final BW, ADG, G:F, water intake, or carcass characteristics. Heifers receiving a growth-promoting agent were 11.6 kg (SE = 4.08) heavier and gained 0.108 kg/d (SE = 0.04) more (P < 0.05) than control heifers. Heifers receiving ET gained 0.09 kg/d (SE = 0.032) more (P = 0.05) than heifers not receiving ET. Heifers receiving ET (with and without MGA) had greater G:F (P < 0.05) than control, E, and TBA heifers. Carcass weights of ET-treated heifers were greater (P < 0.05) than carcass weights for unimplanted heifers, those fed MGA only, and heifers receiving either E or TBA implants. Marbling scores were increased (P < 0.05) by feeding MGA to ET-treated heifers. Water intake was greater (P < 0.01) in the summer (31 L/d) than in the winter (18 L/d), with no difference among implant treatments. Heifers fed in the winter had heavier carcasses, less 12th-rib fat, greater marbling scores, larger LM area, and a greater incidence of liver abscesses than heifers finished in the summer (P < 0.01). A treatment x season interaction (P = 0.07) was evident for DMI during the 35-d coldest and hottest portions of the year. Heifers fed MGA and implanted with ET tended (P = 0.07) to have greater DMI in the summer but lesser DMI in the winter. In general, differences among growth-promotant programs were relatively similar over the entire summer and in winter.
Key Words: Anabolic Steroids Environment Feedlots Heifers Performance Seasons
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. E. Sides, R. S. Swingle, J. T. Vasconcelos, R. C. Borg, and W. M. Moseley Effect of Feeding Melengestrol Acetate, Monensin, and Tylosin on Performance, Carcass Measurements, and Liver Abscesses of Feedlot Heifers Professional Animal Scientist, August 1, 2009; 25(4): 459 - 464. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Griffin, G. E. Erickson, B. D. Dicke, T. J. Klopfenstein, R. J. Cooper, D. J. Jordon, R. S. Swingle, W. M. Moseley, G. E. Sides, and D. J. Weigel Effects of Ractopamine (Optaflexx) Fed in Combination with Melengestrol Acetate on Feedlot Heifer Performance Professional Animal Scientist, February 1, 2009; 25(1): 33 - 40. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Schneider, J. D. Tatum, T. E. Engle, and T. C. Bryant Effects of heifer finishing implants on beef carcass traits and longissimus tenderness J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 2019 - 2030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Mader and W. M. Kreikemeier Effects of growth-promoting agents and season on blood metabolites and body temperature in heifers J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(4): 1030 - 1037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |