J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kreikemeier, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mader, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kreikemeier, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mader, T. L.
J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:2481-2488
© 2004 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL PRODUCTION

Effects of growth-promoting agents and season on yearling feedlot heifer performance1

W. M. Kreikemeier and T. L. Mader2

Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908

2 Correspondence: Haskell Agricultural Laboratory, 57905 866 Road, Concord, NE 68728 (phone: 402-584-2812; fax: 402-584-2859; e-mail: tmader{at}unlnotes.unl.edu).

Angus x crossbred heifers (270 per trial) were used in an experiment conducted over one 105-d summer and one 104-d winter feeding period. Treatments were identical for each trial and included: 1) control, 2) estrogenic implant (E), 3) trenbolone acetate implant (TBA), 4) E + TBA (ET), 5) melengestrol acetate (MGA) in the feed, and 6) ET + MGA (ETM). Each treatment was replicated in five pens, with nine heifers per pen in each season. Initial weights (mean = 384 kg, SE = 57) were the same for each season. There were no treatment x season interactions for final BW, ADG, G:F, water intake, or carcass characteristics. Heifers receiving a growth-promoting agent were 11.6 kg (SE = 4.08) heavier and gained 0.108 kg/d (SE = 0.04) more (P < 0.05) than control heifers. Heifers receiving ET gained 0.09 kg/d (SE = 0.032) more (P = 0.05) than heifers not receiving ET. Heifers receiving ET (with and without MGA) had greater G:F (P < 0.05) than control, E, and TBA heifers. Carcass weights of ET-treated heifers were greater (P < 0.05) than carcass weights for unimplanted heifers, those fed MGA only, and heifers receiving either E or TBA implants. Marbling scores were increased (P < 0.05) by feeding MGA to ET-treated heifers. Water intake was greater (P < 0.01) in the summer (31 L/d) than in the winter (18 L/d), with no difference among implant treatments. Heifers fed in the winter had heavier carcasses, less 12th-rib fat, greater marbling scores, larger LM area, and a greater incidence of liver abscesses than heifers finished in the summer (P < 0.01). A treatment x season interaction (P = 0.07) was evident for DMI during the 35-d coldest and hottest portions of the year. Heifers fed MGA and implanted with ET tended (P = 0.07) to have greater DMI in the summer but lesser DMI in the winter. In general, differences among growth-promotant programs were relatively similar over the entire summer and in winter.

Key Words: Anabolic Steroids • Environment • Feedlots • Heifers • Performance • Seasons




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
G. E. Sides, R. S. Swingle, J. T. Vasconcelos, R. C. Borg, and W. M. Moseley
Effect of Feeding Melengestrol Acetate, Monensin, and Tylosin on Performance, Carcass Measurements, and Liver Abscesses of Feedlot Heifers
Professional Animal Scientist, August 1, 2009; 25(4): 459 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
W. A. Griffin, G. E. Erickson, B. D. Dicke, T. J. Klopfenstein, R. J. Cooper, D. J. Jordon, R. S. Swingle, W. M. Moseley, G. E. Sides, and D. J. Weigel
Effects of Ractopamine (Optaflexx) Fed in Combination with Melengestrol Acetate on Feedlot Heifer Performance
Professional Animal Scientist, February 1, 2009; 25(1): 33 - 40.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. A. Schneider, J. D. Tatum, T. E. Engle, and T. C. Bryant
Effects of heifer finishing implants on beef carcass traits and longissimus tenderness
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 2019 - 2030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. L. Mader and W. M. Kreikemeier
Effects of growth-promoting agents and season on blood metabolites and body temperature in heifers
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(4): 1030 - 1037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Animal Science.