| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
ANIMAL PRODUCTION |
* Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2P5, Canada;
and
Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Western Forage Beef Group, Lacombe Research Centre, Lacombe, Alberta T4L 1W1, Canada; and
and
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Center, Lethbridge, Alberta T1J 4B1, Canada
2 Correspondence: S. S. Moore, 4-10 Ag/For Bldg. (phone: 780-492-0169; fax: 780-492-4265; e-mail: stephen.moore{at}ualberta.ca).
Residual feed intake (RFI) has been proposed as an index for determining beef cattle energetic efficiency. Although the relationship of RFI with feed conversion ratio (FCR) is well established, little is known about how RFI compares to other measures of efficiency. This study examined the phenotypic relationships among different measures of energetic efficiency with growth, feed intake, and ultrasound and carcass merit of hybrid cattle (n = 150). Dry matter intake, ME intake (MEI), ADG, metabolic weight (MWT), and FCR during the test averaged 10.29 kg/d (SD = 1.62), 1,185.45 kJ/(kg0.75•d) (SD = 114.69), 1.42 kg/d (SD = 0.25), 86.67 kg0.75 (SD = 10.21), and 7.27 kg of DM/kg of gain (SD = 1.00), respectively. Residual feed intake averaged 0.00 kg/d and ranged from –2.25 kg/d (most efficient) to 2.61 kg/d (least efficient). Dry matter intake (r = 0.75), MEI (r = 0.83), and FCR (r = 0.62) were correlated with RFI (P < 0.001) and were higher for animals with high (>0.5 SD) RFI vs. those with medium (± 0.5 SD) or low (<0.5 SD) RFI (P < 0.001). Partial efficiency of growth (PEG; energetic efficiency for ADG) was correlated with RFI (r = –0.89, P < 0.001) and was lower (P < 0.001) for high- vs. medium- or low-RFI animals. However, RFI was not related to ADG (r = –0.03), MWT (r = –0.02), relative growth rate (RGR; growth relative to instantaneous body size; r = –0.04), or Kleiber ratio (KR; ADG per unit of MWT; r = –0.004). Also, DMI was correlated (P < 0.01) with ADG (r = 0.66), MWT (r = 0.49), FCR (r = 0.49), PEG (r = –0.52), RGR (r = 0.18), and KR (r = 0.36). Additionally, FCR was correlated (P < 0.001) with ADG (r = –0.63), PEG (r = –0.83), RGR (r = –0.75), and KR (r = –0.73), but not with MWT (r = 0.07). Correlations of measures of efficiency with ultrasound or carcass traits generally were not different from zero except for correlations of RFI, FCR, and PEG, respectively, with backfat gain (r = 0.30, 0.20, and –0.30), ultrasound backfat (r = 0.19, 0.21, and –0.25), grade fat (r = 0.25, 0.19, and –0.27), lean meat yield (r = –0.22, –0.18, and 0.24), and yield grade (r = 0.28, 0.24, and –0.25). These phenotypic relationships indicate that, compared with other measures of energetic efficiency, RFI should have a greater potential to improve overall production efficiency and PEG above maintenance, and lead to minimal correlated changes in carcass merit without altering the growth and body size of different animals.
Key Words: Beef Cattle • Carcass Merit • Efficiency • Performance
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. L. Sherman, J. D. Nkrumah, B. M. Murdoch, C. Li, Z. Wang, A. Fu, and S. S. Moore Polymorphisms and haplotypes in the bovine neuropeptide Y, growth hormone receptor, ghrelin, insulin-like growth factor 2, and uncoupling proteins 2 and 3 genes and their associations with measures of growth, performance, feed efficiency, and carcass merit in beef cattle J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 1 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Golden, M. S. Kerley, and W. H. Kolath The relationship of feeding behavior to residual feed intake in crossbred Angus steers fed traditional and no-roughage diets J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 180 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Nkrumah, J. A. Basarab, Z. Wang, C. Li, M. A. Price, E. K. Okine, D. H. Crews Jr., and S. S. Moore Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feed intake and measures of efficiency with growth and carcass merit of beef cattle J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2711 - 2720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. Roberts, S. I. Paisley, T. W. Geary, E. E. Grings, R. C. Waterman, and M. D. MacNeil Effects of restricted feeding of beef heifers during the postweaning period on growth, efficiency, and ultrasound carcass characteristics J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2740 - 2745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Nkrumah, D. H. Crews Jr, J. A. Basarab, M. A. Price, E. K. Okine, Z. Wang, C. Li, and S. S. Moore Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feeding behavior and temperament with performance, feed efficiency, ultrasound, and carcass merit of beef cattle J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2382 - 2390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Nkrumah, D. H. Keisler, D. H. Crews Jr., J. A. Basarab, Z. Wang, C. Li, M. A. Price, E. K. Okine, and S. S. Moore Genetic and phenotypic relationships of serum leptin concentration with performance, efficiency of gain, and carcass merit of feedlot cattle J Anim Sci, September 1, 2007; 85(9): 2147 - 2155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Wang, J. D. Nkrumah, C. Li, J. A. Basarab, L. A. Goonewardene, E. K. Okine, D. H. Crews Jr., and S. S. Moore Test duration for growth, feed intake, and feed efficiency in beef cattle using the GrowSafe System J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2289 - 2298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Nkrumah, E. K. Okine, G. W. Mathison, K. Schmid, C. Li, J. A. Basarab, M. A. Price, Z. Wang, and S. S. Moore Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 145 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Nkrumah, C. Li, J. Yu, C. Hansen, D. H. Keisler, and S. S. Moore Polymorphisms in the bovine leptin promoter associated with serum leptin concentration, growth, feed intake, feeding behavior, and measures of carcass merit J Anim Sci, January 1, 2005; 83(1): 20 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
