HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wellock, I. J. Articles by Kyriazakis, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wellock, I. J. Articles by Kyriazakis, I.

Modeling the effects of stressors on the performance of populations of pigs¹

Animal Nutrition and Health Department, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Scotland

² Correspondence: Bush Estate, Penicuik, EH26 0PH (phone: +44 131 5353299; fax: +44 131 5353121; e-mail: i.wellock{at}ed.sac.ac.uk).

A simulation model that predicts the effect of the social, physical, and nutritional environments on pig food intake and performance was extended to deal with individual variation. The aim was to investigate the effect of between-animal variation on the performance of a population of growing pigs. Variation was generated in initial state, growth potential, and ability to cope when exposed to social "stressors" (EX). Variation in initial state is described by initial body weight (BW₀), from which the chemical composition of the pig is calculated. Variation in growth potential is described by creating variation in the genetic growth descriptors. Variation in EX exists between genotypes, where it has been suggested that leaner, more modern genotype pigs tend to be less able to cope. It is expected that within a population or group that the social environment (i.e., position within the social hierarchy) also affects an individual’s ability to cope. In the model, it is assumed that the larger, more dominant individuals are better able to cope when exposed to social stressors. Consequently, within a population, EX is correlated with body weight around the genotype mean. Model predictions showed that increasing the variation in BW₀ and EX increased the variation in pig performance. This is an important practical consideration in commercial pig production, where the heterogeneity of the population at slaughter may affect the profitability of an enterprise. The way a stressor constrains performance determines whether the mean population response to a given stressor is the same as the average individual response. If all pigs in a group are affected at the same stressor intensity (e.g., all are either mixed or not), then the predicted average individual and mean population responses will be the same. If, however, the intensity of stressor at which performance becomes limiting differs between individuals (such as space allowance or temperature), differences between the individual and mean population responses will be predicted. Variation in the growth response of a population was determined to a greater extent by variation in EX and BW₀ than by variation in growth potential, when pigs were housed in simulated conditions likely to be encountered in commercial environments. Consequently, decreasing the variation in initial body weight and improving ability of pigs to cope may be a better way of improving pig performance than selecting only for increased growth potential.

Key Words: Genetic Variation • Growth • Pig • Simulation Models • Stress

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. P. Schinckel, D. C. Mahan, T. G. Wiseman, and M. E. Einstein Growth of protein, moisture, lipid, and ash of two genetic lines of barrows and gilts from twenty to one hundred twenty-five kilograms of body weight J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 460 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]