| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
ANIMAL PRODUCTION |
* Pork Industry Institute, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409-2141, and
and
Cargill Pork, Inc., Russellville, AR 72811
2 Correspondence—phone: 806-742-2826; fax: 806-742-2335; e-mail: john.mcglone{at}ttu.edu.
Two hundred ninety-six gestating sows were used to determine the physical dimensions of sows in commercial settings. Sows were examined from five farms within a single production model that included identical feed formulation, management practices, herd health, and similar, but not identical, genotypes. Sows were individually weighed, backfat thickness was determined by ultrasound, and body dimensions were determined. Sow body length, height, width (lateral length, left to right from midline), and depth (measured as distance from ventral to dorsal extremes) were also determined. Regression procedures were used to model the changes in sow body size in relation to parity, BW, and stage of gestation within and among genotypes. Farm-to-farm variation in sow dimensions for the same genotype was also determined. Least squares means, SD, and 95% upper confidence limits of this sample are presented. Sows increased (P < 0.001) in body dimensions by predicable levels with parity (r2 = 0.92) up to Parity 6, and with advancing pregnancy (r2 = 0.99). Sows of different but related genotypes differed (P < 0.01) in body length, width, height, and depth. Sows of the same genotype, fed the same feed formulation, differed in body dimensions when managed on different farms. Based on mean values and a 95% confidence interval, stall width would need to be at least 72.4 cm to accommodate all sows on the farm. These data and models can be used to design stall sizes and farm floor space needs to meet current animal welfare recommendations. To accommodate the body size of pregnant sows on commercial farms, stall sizes for the majority of sows would need to increase, as would the total floor space needed for a given number of gestating sows individually penned in conventional production systems to meet recently published guidelines.
Key Words: Body Dimensions • Pigs • Sow • Welfare
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. L. Salak-Johnson, S. R. Niekamp, S. L. Rodriguez-Zas, M. Ellis, and S. E. Curtis Space allowance for dry, pregnant sows in pens: Body condition, skin lesions, and performance J Anim Sci, July 1, 2007; 85(7): 1758 - 1769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. C. Croney and S. T. Millman BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: The ethical and behavioral bases for farm animal welfare legislation J Anim Sci, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 556 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Zurbrigg Sow shoulder lesions: Risk factors and treatment effects on an Ontario farm J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2509 - 2514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. W. Gonyou, M. C. Brumm, E. Bush, J. Deen, S. A. Edwards, T. Fangman, J. J. McGlone, M. Meunier-Salaun, R. B. Morrison, H. Spoolder, et al. Application of broken-line analysis to assess floor space requirements of nursery and grower-finisher pigs expressed on an allometric basis J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 229 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
