J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrell, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrell, C. L.
J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:1876-1881
© 2004 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL PRODUCTION

Preweaning efficiency for mature cows of breed crosses from tropically adapted Bos indicus and Bos taurus and unadapted Bos taurus breeds1

T. G. Jenkins2 and C. L. Ferrell

ARS, USDA, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166

2 Correspondence: P.O. Box 166 (phone: 402-762-4247; fax: 402-762-4173; e-mail: jenkins{at}email.marc.usda.gov).

Abstract

Production data were collected on mature cows produced by mating Angus and Hereford (pooled AH), Brahman (Bh) and Boran (Br), and Tuli, a tropically adapted Bos taurus, sires by AI or natural service to Angus and Hereford cows. These cows were mated to Charolais bulls for the purpose of this study. Within each sire breed of cow, cows were assigned randomly to one of three feeding rates, 49 or 76 g of DMI/BW0.75 or ad libitum (10 to 12 cows/feeding rate group), with weekly individual animal feed consumption recorded. Lactation yields were recorded via the weigh-suckle-weigh protocol at approximately 14, 28, 56, 84, 112, 140, 168, and 196 d postpartum for each cow/calf pair. Means for milk yield at peak lactation, total milk yields, calf birth weight, age-adjusted weaning weights, preweaning daily gain, and feed efficiency were estimated. Peak yield (kg/d) for Bh (10.3 ± 0.36) was greater (P < 0.05) than for Tuli (9.0 ± 0.31). Total yield (kg, 212 d) for Bh (1802 ± 68) was greater (P < 0.05) than for Tuli (1532 ± 59). Birth weight of AH (44 ± 0.9) was heavier than for Bh and Br (P < 0.05). Preweaning daily calf gain (g/d) and adjusted weaning weight (kg) of Bh (813 ± 28, 212 ± 6.1) and Br (766 ± 24, 202 ± 5.1) differed (P < 0.05) from AH (589 ± 24, 169 ± 5.2) and Tuli (634 ± 24, 176 ± 5.3). Efficiency estimates (grams of adjusted weaning weight/kilograms DMI of the cow) for Bh (88 ± 2.5) and Br (85 ± 2.1) exceeded (P < 0.05) those for Tuli (74 ± 2.1) and AH (73 ± 2.1). Bos indicus breed crosses exhibited greater peak and total yield, lower birth weight, greater daily gain and adjusted weaning weight, and higher feed efficiency than did Bos taurus breed crosses (P < 0.05). Total yield, daily gain, adjusted weaning weight, and feed efficiency were higher (P < 0.05) for cows sired by bulls from tropically adapted breeds, and the peak yield was less (P < 0.10). Tuli exhibited lower total yield and birth weight than did Angus/Hereford (P < 0.05). The efficiency of crossbred Tuli cows did not differ from Angus/Hereford F1 females, but neither equaled the efficiency of crossbred cows produced using Bos indicus breeds.

Key Words: Adapted • Cattle • Efficiency • Preweaning • Sanga




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. G. Jenkins and C. L. Ferrell
Daily dry matter intake to sustain body weight of mature, nonlactating, nonpregnant cows
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2007; 85(7): 1787 - 1792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Animal Science.