| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
ANIMAL PRODUCTION |
* Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Burns, OR 97720;
and
Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, USDA-ARS, Burns; and
and
ADM Alliance Nutrition, Inc., Quincy, IL 62305
3 Correspondence: 67826-A Hwy 205 (phone: 541-573-8910; fax: 541-573-3042; e-mail: dave.bohnert{at}oregonstate.edu).
Abstract
Five steers (491 ± 21 kg BW) were used in an incomplete 5 x 4 Latin square with four 24-d periods to determine the influence of supplemental nonprotein N (NPN) source and supplementation frequency (SF) on nutrient intake and site of digestion in steers consuming low-quality grass straw (4% CP). Treatments (TRT) included an unsupplemented control and a urea- or biuret-containing supplement placed directly into the rumen daily (D) or every other day (2D) at 0700. The NPN treatments were formulated to provide 90% of the estimated degradable intake protein requirement. Daily TRT were supplemented CP at 0.04% of BW/d, whereas the 2D TRT were supplemented at 0.08% of BW every other day. Therefore, all supplemented TRT received the same quantity of supplemental CP over a 2-d period. Forage OM intake was not affected (P > 0.05) by NPN supplementation, NPN source, or SF; however, total OM and N intake were increased (P < 0.01) with CP supplementation. Duodenal flow of N was greater (P = 0.04) with CP supplementation compared with the control. In addition, duodenal bacterial N flow was increased with CP supplementation (P = 0.04) and for biuret compared with urea (P < 0.01). Bacterial efficiency (g bacterial N/kg OM truly digested in the rumen) was greater (P = 0.05) for biuret than for urea. Apparent total-tract N digestibility was increased with NPN supplementation (P < 0.01) but not affected by NPN source or SF. These results suggest that urea or biuret can be used effectively as a supplemental N source by steers consuming low-quality forage.
Key Words: Biuret • Forage • Frequency • Nonprotein Nitrogen • Supplementation • Urea
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. J. Hersom Opportunities to enhance performance and efficiency through nutrient synchrony in forage-fed ruminants J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E306 - E317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. Marini, D. G. Fox, and M. R. Murphy Nitrogen transactions along the gastrointestinal tract of cattle: A meta-analytical approach J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(3): 660 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. A. Currier, D. W. Bohnert, S. J. Falck, C. S. Schauer, and S. J. Bartle Daily and alternate-day supplementation of urea or biuret to ruminants consuming low-quality forage: III. Effects on ruminal fermentation characteristics in steers J Anim Sci, May 1, 2004; 82(5): 1528 - 1535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
