|
|
||||||||
ANIMAL PRODUCTION |


* Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Burns 97720;
and
Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, USDA-ARS, Burns; and
and
ADM Alliance Nutrition, Inc., Quincy, IL 62305
3 Correspondence: 67826-A Hwy 205 (phone: 541-573-8910; e-mail: dave.bohnert{at}oregonstate.edu).
Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to determine the influence of supplemental nonprotein N (NPN) provided daily (D) or every other day (2D) on ruminant performance and N efficiency. Treatments included an unsupplemented control (CON) and a urea (28.7% CP) or biuret (28.6% CP) supplement provided D or 2D at 0700. In Exp. 1, five wethers (39 ± 1 kg BW) were used in an incomplete 5 x 4 Latin square with four 24-d periods to determine the influence of supplemental NPN source and supplementation frequency (SF) on the efficiency of N use in lambs consuming low-quality grass straw (4% CP). The amount of CP supplied by each supplement was approximately 0.10% of BW/d (averaged over a 2-d period). In Exp. 2, 80 Angus x Hereford cows (540 ± 8 kg BW) in the last third of gestation were used to determine the effect of NPN source and SF on cow performance. The NPN treatments were formulated to provide 90% of the estimated degradable intake protein requirement. The supplemented treatments received the same amount of supplemental N over a 2-d period; therefore, the 2D treatments received double the quantity of supplemental N on their respective supplementation day than the D treatments. In Exp. 1, total DM, OM, and N intake; DM, OM, and N digestibility; N balance; and digested N retained were greater (P < 0.03) for supplemented than for CON wethers, with no difference (P > 0.05) between NPN sources or SF. Plasma urea-N (PUN) was increased with N supplementation compared with CON (P < 0.01), and urea treatments had greater PUN than biuret (P < 0.01). In addition, PUN was greater (P = 0.02) for D than for 2D treatments. In Exp. 2, pre- and postcalving (within 14 d and 24 h after calving, respectively) cow weight and body condition score change were more positive (P < 0.05) for supplemented groups than for CON. These results suggest that supplements containing urea or biuret as the primary source of supplemental N can be effectively used by lambs and cows consuming low-quality forage, even when provided every other day.
Key Words: Biuret Forage Frequency Nonprotein Nitrogen Supplementation Urea
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. A. Wickersham, E. C. Titgemeyer, R. C. Cochran, E. E. Wickersham, and E. S. Moore Effect of frequency and amount of rumen-degradable intake protein supplementation on urea kinetics and microbial use of recycled urea in steers consuming low-quality forage J Anim Sci, November 1, 2008; 86(11): 3089 - 3099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Reynolds and N. B. Kristensen Nitrogen recycling through the gut and the nitrogen economy of ruminants: An asynchronous symbiosis J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E293 - E305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Hersom Opportunities to enhance performance and efficiency through nutrient synchrony in forage-fed ruminants J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E306 - E317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Currier, D. W. Bohnert, S. J. Falck, C. S. Schauer, and S. J. Bartle Daily and alternate-day supplementation of urea or biuret to ruminants consuming low-quality forage: II. Effects on site of digestion and microbial efficiency in steers J Anim Sci, May 1, 2004; 82(5): 1518 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Currier, D. W. Bohnert, S. J. Falck, C. S. Schauer, and S. J. Bartle Daily and alternate-day supplementation of urea or biuret to ruminants consuming low-quality forage: III. Effects on ruminal fermentation characteristics in steers J Anim Sci, May 1, 2004; 82(5): 1528 - 1535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |