|
|
||||||||
ANIMAL GENETICS |
CSIRO Livestock Industries, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, St. Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia
2 Correspondence: 306 Carmody Road (phone: +61-7-3214-2392; fax: +61-7-3214-2881; e-mail: tony.reverter-gomez{at}csiro.au).
Abstract
We proposed a novel statistical approach for the analysis of cDNA experiments based on mixed-model methodology combined with mixtures of distributions. Our objective was to detect genes that may be involved in conferring heritable differences in susceptibility to common infections in intensive pig production. We employed a microarray expression profiling strategy and a mixed-model approach to the analysis of the expression data. A cDNA microarray of pig with 6,420 probes from immune tissues and cells was used to compare gene expression in peripheral blood leukocytes of two pigs showing extreme performance in their response to infection with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Principal components analyses were used to identify the two most extreme-performing pigs after infection (i.e., pigs whose measured responses to infection fell at the extremes). Blood samples and expression profiles from 0 to 24 h after infection were compared using a bivariate, mixed-model approach, in which the effect gene x immunological status interaction was treated as a random effect. Bayesian model-based clustering via mixtures of normal distributions of the resulting BLUP of the random interaction was approached and resulted in a list of 307 differentially expressed genes, of which 179 were down-regulated in the susceptible pig. The majority of the differentially expressed genes were derived from a cDNA library of leukocytes of A. pleuropneumoniae-challenged pigs that were subtracted against leukocytes before the challenge. These results provide evidence that the proposed statistical approach was useful in enhancing the knowledge of the mechanisms involved in the genetics of the immune response.
Key Words: Complementary DNA Gene Expression Microarray Swine
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Ponsuksili, E. Murani, C. Walz, M. Schwerin, and K. Wimmers Pre- and postnatal hepatic gene expression profiles of two pig breeds differing in body composition: insight into pathways of metabolic regulation Physiol Genomics, May 11, 2007; 29(3): 267 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Kerr, K. L. Bunter, R. Seymour, B. Shen, and A. Reverter The heritability of the expression of two stress-regulated gene fragments in pigs J Anim Sci, August 1, 2005; 83(8): 1753 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Byrne, Y. H. Wang, S. A. Lehnert, G. S. Harper, S. M. McWilliam, H. L. Bruce, and A. Reverter Gene expression profiling of muscle tissue in Brahman steers during nutritional restriction J Anim Sci, January 1, 2005; 83(1): 1 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Reverter, Y. H. Wang, K. A. Byrne, S. H. Tan, G. S. Harper, and S. A. Lehnert Joint analysis of multiple cDNA microarray studies via multivariate mixed models applied to genetic improvement of beef cattle J Anim Sci, December 1, 2004; 82(12): 3430 - 3439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |