HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sindt, J. J. Articles by LaBrune, H. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sindt, J. J. Articles by LaBrune, H. J.

Effect of Maillard reaction products on ruminal and fecal acid-resistant E. coli, total coliforms, VFA profiles, and pH in steers¹

Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506-1600

² Correspondence: Call Hall, Room 133 (phone: 785-532-1204; fax: 785-532-5681; e-mail: jdrouill{at}oznet.ksu.edu).

Abstract

Six ruminally cannulated Angus-cross steers (362 kg) were used in a replicated 3 x 3 Latin square design to determine effects of supplementing Maillard reaction products (MRP) on acid-resistant E. coli and coliform populations. Steers were fed roughage-based diets supplemented (DM basis) with either 10% soybean meal (SBM), 10% nonenzymatically browned SBM (NESBM), or 10% SBM top-dressed with 45 g of a lysine-dextrose Maillard reaction product (LD-MRP). Equal weights of dextrose, lysine hydrochloride, and deionized water were refluxed to produce the LD-MRP. The NESBM was manufactured by treating SBM with invertase enzyme, followed by heating to induce nonenzymatic browning. Steers were allowed slightly less than ad libitum access to diets fed twice daily and were adapted to their respective treatments within 10 d. On d 11, ruminal and fecal samples were collected at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h after feeding from each of the steers and transported to the laboratory for microbial analysis. Ruminal samples and feces were analyzed for pH and VFA, and both ruminal fluid and feces were tested for acid-resistant E. coli and total coliforms by incubating samples in tryptic soy broth adjusted to pH 2, 4, and 7. Ruminal pH and total VFA concentrations did not differ among treatments. The molar proportion of ruminal acetate was higher (P < 0.05) for steers receiving NESBM than for steers receiving SBM and LD-MRP. At pH 4, steers that received NESBM had lower (P < 0.05) ruminal populations of E. coli and total coliforms than steers that received SBM. No differences were observed for ruminal E. coli and total coliforms at pH 2 and 7. Fecal pH was lower (P < 0.05) for steers fed NESBM than for steers fed SBM or LD-MRP. Molar proportions of fecal acetate were lower (P < 0.05) and proportions of butyrate and isovalerate were higher (P < 0.05) for steers fed NESBM compared with steers fed SBM. Fecal E. coli at pH 4 was lower (P < 0.05) for steers fed NESBM than for steers fed LD-MRP. Fecal E. coli and total coliforms at pH 2 and 7 did not differ among treatments. Dietary MRP had limited effectiveness at decreasing acid-resistant coliforms in the rumen and feces of cattle. Acid resistance in coliforms may depend on protein availability.

Key Words: Cattle • E. coli • Maillard Reaction Products