J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petry, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Petry, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. K.
J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:1000-1006
© 2004 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL GENETICS

Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the Nebraska Index line. I. Reproductive responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters1

D. B. Petry and R. K. Johnson2

Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908

2 Correspondence: A218 Animal Sciences (phone: 402-472-6404; fax: 402-472-6362; e-mail: rjohnson5{at}unl.edu).

Abstract

Our objective was to estimate responses in reproductive traits in the Nebraska Index line (I) after 19 generations of selection for increased litter size. Responses were estimated in dams producing pure line, F1, and three-way cross litters. A total of 850 litters were produced over six year-seasons, including 224 pure line litters, 393 F1 litters produced from I and C females mated with Danbred NA Landrace (L) or Duroc-Hampshire (T) boars, and 233 litters by F1 L x I and L x C females mated with T boars. Contrasts of means were used to estimate the genetic difference between I and C and interactions of line differences with mating type. Farrowing rates of lines I (û = 91.0%) and C (û = 92.8%) did not differ. Averaged across all genetic groups, mean number born alive per litter was 10.1 pigs, and number and weight of pigs weaned per litter, both adjusted for number nursed and weaning age of 12 d, were 9.7 pigs and 34.4 kg, respectively. Averaged across mating types, direct genetic effects of I were greater than C (P < 0.05) for total born (3.53 pigs), number born alive (2.53 pigs), number of mummified pigs (0.22 pig), and litter birth weight (2.14 kg). The direct genetic effect of line I was less than C (P < 0.05) for litter weaning weight (-1.88 kg). Interactions of line effects with crossing system were significant (P < 0.05) for total number born, number of stillborn pigs, number weaned, and litter weaning weight. In pure line litters, I exceeded C by 4.18 total pigs and 1.76 stillborn pigs per litter, whereas the estimate of I–C in F1 litters was 2.74 total pigs and 0.78 stillborn pig per litter. The contrast between I and C for number weaned and litter weaning weight in pure litters was 0.32 pig and -0.28 kg, respectively, compared with 0.25 pig and -2.14 kg in F1 litters. Crossbreeding is an effective way to use the enhanced reproductive efficiency of the Index line.

Key Words: Crossbreeding • Litter Size • Reproduction • Selection




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. B. Petry, J. Lunney, P. Boyd, D. Kuhar, E. Blankenship, and R. K. Johnson
Differential immunity in pigs with high and low responses to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2007; 85(9): 2075 - 2092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. Su, M. S. Lund, and D. Sorensen
Selection for litter size at day five to improve litter size at weaning and piglet survival rate
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1385 - 1392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. B. Petry, J. W. Holl, J. S. Weber, A. R. Doster, F. A. Osorio, and R. K. Johnson
Biological responses to porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus in pigs of two genetic populations
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2005; 83(7): 1494 - 1502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Animal Science.