J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aaron, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hays, V. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aaron, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hays, V. W.
J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:E245-E254
© 2004 American Society of Animal Science

How many pigs? Statistical power considerations in swine nutrition experiments1

D. K. Aaron2 and V. W. Hays

University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546-0215

2 Correspondence: 208 W. P. Garrigus Bldg. (phone: 859-257-7553; fax: 859-257-5318; e-mail: daaron{at}uky.edu).

Replication refers to the assignment of more than one experimental unit to the same treatment. Each replication of a treatment is an independent observation; thus, each replication involves a different experimental unit. In swine nutrition research, the experimental unit may be an individual animal, as in sow reproduction experiments, or a group of animals, as in growing-finishing pig experiments. In either case, calculation of the number of replicates needed to give an accurate and reliable outcome is an important step in deriving an experimental protocol. Although investigators often seem to choose replication arbitrarily on the basis of cost or availability of animals, housing considerations, convenience, or tradition, the question of how many pigs (i.e., how much replication is necessary) is a statistical one that has a statistical answer. A power analysis, performed while designing an experiment, will provide an investigator with an estimate of the number of replicates needed for an experiment of known power and sensitivity. This a priori, or prospective, power analysis ensures that an investigator does not waste time and resources carrying out an experiment that has little chance of finding a significant effect, if one exists. It also makes sure resources are not wasted by including more experimental units than are necessary to detect an effect. A retrospective, or a posteriori, power analysis may also be conducted. If no significant effects are found in an experiment, an investigator can assess the observed power of the experiment, or may determine the size of treatment effect that could have been detected using the standard deviation and number of replicates in the experiment. The latter may be useful in explaining results. However, the former may be misleading because a high P-value will invariably result in a low observed power, and little new information will be gained from the post hoc power analysis. In most cases, the time for making power calculations is before, not after, an experiment is conducted.

Key Words: Replication • Statistical Power • Swine Nutrition






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Animal Science.