| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
,3
* Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24060;
and
Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907;
and
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061; and
and
Aviagen NA, Huntsville, AL 35805
2 Correspondence: 3270 Litton Reaves Hall (phone: 540-231-5287; fax: 540-231-5014; e-mail: knowlton{at}vt.edu).
Water quality in the United States is threatened by contamination with nutrients, primarily nitrogen and phosphorus. Animal manure can be a valuable resource for farmers, providing nutrients, improving soil structure, and increasing vegetative cover to decrease erosion potential. At the same time, application of manure nutrients in excess of crop requirements can result in environmental contamination. Environmental concerns with P are primarily associated with pollution of surface water (streams, lakes, rivers). This pollution may be caused by runoff of P when application to land is in excess of crop requirements. Increased specialization and concentration of livestock and crop production has led to the net export of nutrients from major crop-producing areas of the country to areas with a high concentration of animal agriculture. Concentrated animal agriculture has been identified as a significant source of P contamination of surface water. Areas facing the dilemma of an economically important livestock industry concentrated in an environmentally sensitive area have few options. If agricultural practices continue as they have in the past, continued damage to water resources and a loss of fishing and recreational activity are inevitable. If agricultural productivity is decreased, however, the maintenance of a stable farm economy, a viable rural economy, and a reliable domestic food supply are seriously threatened. Decreasing the P content of manure through nutrition is a powerful, cost-effective approach to reducing P losses from livestock farms and will help farmers meet increasingly stringent environmental regulations. This paper reviews opportunities available to reduce the P content of livestock manure, including more accurate interpretation of the published P requirements of animals, improved diet formulation and group-feeding strategies to more precisely meet requirements, and approaches to improve availability of feed P for monogastric and ruminant species.
Key Words: Cattle • Phosphorus Excretion • Phytase • Poultry • Swine
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. L. Capper, E. Castaneda-Gutierrez, R. A. Cady, and D. E. Bauman The environmental impact of recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST) use in dairy production PNAS, July 15, 2008; 105(28): 9668 - 9673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. U. Metzler, R. Mosenthin, T. Baumgartel, and M. Rodehutscord The effect of dietary phosphorus and calcium level, phytase supplementation, and ileal infusion of pectin on the chemical composition and carbohydrase activity of fecal bacteria and the level of microbial metabolites in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs J Anim Sci, July 1, 2008; 86(7): 1544 - 1555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. J. Lorenz, M. P. Scott, and K. R. Lamkey Genetic Variation and Breeding Potential of Phytate and Inorganic Phosphorus in a Maize Population Crop Sci., January 16, 2008; 48(1): 79 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. F. Knowlton, M. S. Taylor, S. R. Hill, C. Cobb, and K. F. Wilson Manure Nutrient Excretion by Lactating Cows Fed Exogenous Phytase and Cellulase J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4356 - 4360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Wu Utilization of Phosphorus in Lactating Cows Fed Varying Amounts of Phosphorus and Sources of Fiber J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2005; 88(8): 2850 - 2859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
