| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
University of Nebraska, West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte 69101
3 Correspondence: 461 W. University Dr. (phone: 308-532-3611; fax: 308-532-3823; e-mail: rfunston2{at}unl.edu).
Inadequate dietary energy intake and poor body condition can negatively affect reproductive function. Supplemental lipids have been used to increase energy density of the diet and may also have direct positive effects on reproduction in beef cattle. Several fatty acid sources have been studied as they relate to reproductive function. Common sources include sunflower, safflower, cottonseed, rice bran, soybeans, fishmeal, animal tallow, and calcium salts of fatty acids. Fats have been fed before and after calving, during the breeding season, and during heifer development. Response to fat has been investigated through measuring body weight and body condition score, age at puberty, postpartum interval, first-service conception rates, pregnancy rates, calving interval, calving difficulty, and calf birth and weaning weight. Animal response seems to depend on body condition score, age (parity), nutrients available in the diet, and type of fat supplemented. To elucidate potential mechanisms of action, scientists have investigated changes in follicular and uterine development, hormonal profiles, brain function, and embryonic development. Feeding supplemental fat has resulted in varied and inconsistent effects on reproductive function. Elucidating how supplemental fat can influence reproductive function has been a difficult process. The complexity of the reproductive system and makeup of fat supplements are often confounded by management conditions and forage quality both in research and commercial feeding situations.
Key Words: Beef Cattle • Fat Supplementation • Reproduction
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. Scholljegerdes and S. Kronberg Influence of level of supplemental whole flaxseed on forage intake and site and extent of digestion in beef heifers consuming native grass hay J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2310 - 2320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Hess, G. E. Moss, and D. C. Rule A decade of developments in the area of fat supplementation research with beef cattle and sheep J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E188 - E204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. L. Harris, A. S. Cupp, A. J. Roberts, and R. N. Funston Utilization of soybeans or corn milling by-products in beef heifer development diets J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 476 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. J. Scholljegerdes, S. L. Lake, T. R. Weston, D. C. Rule, G. E. Moss, T. M. Nett, and B. W. Hess Fatty acid composition of plasma, medial basal hypothalamus, and uterine tissue in primiparous beef cows fed high-linoleate safflower seeds J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1555 - 1564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Lake, E. J. Scholljegerdes, T. R. Weston, D. C. Rule, and B. W. Hess Postpartum supplemental fat, but not maternal body condition score at parturition, affects plasma and adipose tissue fatty acid profiles of suckling beef calves J Anim Sci, July 1, 2006; 84(7): 1811 - 1819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Lake, E. J. Scholljegerdes, W. T. Small, E. L. Belden, S. I. Paisley, D. C. Rule, and B. W. Hess Immune response and serum immunoglobulin G concentrations in beef calves suckling cows of differing body condition score at parturition and supplemented with high-linoleate or high-oleate safflower seeds J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(4): 997 - 1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Hess, S. L. Lake, E. J. Scholljegerdes, T. R. Weston, V. Nayigihugu, J. D. C. Molle, and G. E. Moss Nutritional controls of beef cow reproduction J Anim Sci, June 1, 2005; 83(13_suppl): E90 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
