HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rotz, C. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rotz, C. A.

Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal production¹

USDA, ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, University Park, PA 16802-3702

² Correspondence: Building 3702, Curtin Road (phone: 814-865-2049; fax: 814-863-0935; e-mail: al.rotz{at}ars.usda.gov).

Reduction of nitrogen loss in animal production requires whole-farm management. Reduced loss from one farm component is easily negated in another if all components are not equally well managed. Animal excretion of manure N can be decrerased by improving the balance of protein or amino acids fed to that required by individual animals or animal groups or by improving production efficiency. Management to increase milk, meat, or egg production normally improves efficiency by reducing the maintenance protein required per unit of production. Large losses of manure nitrogen occur through the ammonia and nitrous oxide that are emitted into the atmosphere and the nitrate leached into groundwater. Up to half of the excreted nitrogen is lost from the housing facility, but this loss can be decreased through frequent manure removal and by avoiding deep litter systems and feedlots. Techniques such as acid treatment of manure, scrubbing of ventilation air, and floor designs for separating feces and urine substantially reduce ammonia emissions, but these practices are often impractical or uneconomical for general use. Manure storage units improve nutrient utilization by allowing better timing of nutrient application with crop needs. At least 70% of the nitrogen entering anaerobic lagoons is typically lost, but a less than 10% loss can be maintained using slurry storage with a natural crust or other cover, or by drying poultry manure to at least 50% dry matter. Irrigation and surface spreading of manure without soil incorporation often ensures the loss of all remaining nonorganic nitrogen (typically, 20 to 40% of remaining nitrogen). Rapid incorporation and shallow injection methods decrease this loss by at least 50%, and deep injection into the soil essentially eliminates this loss. For grazing animals, excessive loss can be avoided by not overstocking pastures and avoiding late fall and winter grazing. Reducing emissions between the animal and the soil can lead to greater leaching and denitrification losses from the soil if this additional nitrogen is not used properly. The use of a crop rotation that efficiently absorbs these nutrients and applying nitrogen near the time it is needed by crops reduce the potential for further loss. Maintaining the proper number of animals per unit of land available for manure application is always crucial for efficient recycling of nitrogen. Our understanding of nitrogen loss processes is improved through modeling, and computer models assist in the development of integrated systems for efficient and economical nitrogen use in animal production.

Key Words: Ammonia • Denitrification • Farm Production • Leaching • Management • Nitrogen Loss

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Arriaga, M. Pinto, S. Calsamiglia, and P. Merino Nutritional and management strategies on nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiency of lactating dairy cattle on commercial farms: An environmental perspective J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2009; 92(1): 204 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Capper, E. Castaneda-Gutierrez, R. A. Cady, and D. E. Bauman The environmental impact of recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST) use in dairy production PNAS, July 15, 2008; 105(28): 9668 - 9673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Powell, G. A. Broderick, and T. H. Misselbrook Seasonal Diet Affects Ammonia Emissions from Tie-Stall Dairy Barns J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2008; 91(2): 857 - 869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Powell, T. H. Misselbrook, and M. D. Casler Season and Bedding Impacts on Ammonia Emissions from Tie-stall Dairy Barns J. Environ. Qual., January 4, 2008; 37(1): 7 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. H. Choi and P. A. Moore Jr. Effect of Various Litter Amendments on Ammonia Volatilization and Nitrogen Content of Poultry Litter J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2008; 17(4): 454 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. H. Kleinschmit, D. J. Schingoethe, A. R. Hippen, and K. F. Kalscheur Dried Distillers Grains Plus Solubles with Corn Silage or Alfalfa Hay as the Primary Forage Source in Dairy Cow Diets J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5587 - 5599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. Hristov, W. Hazen, and J. W. Ellsworth Efficiency of use of imported nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium and potential for reducing phosphorus imports on idaho dairy farms. J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2006; 89(9): 3702 - 3712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Del Grosso, W. J. Parton, A. R. Mosier, M. K. Walsh, D. S. Ojima, and P. E. Thornton DAYCENT National-Scale Simulations of Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Cropped Soils in the United States. J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2006; 35(4): 1451 - 1460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]