J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gelvin, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Caton, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gelvin, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Caton, J. S.
J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:3589-3599
© 2004 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL NUTRITION

Effect of field pea-based creep feed on intake, digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and performance by nursing calves grazing native range in western North Dakota1

A. A. Gelvin*, G. P. Lardy*,2, S. A. Soto-Navarro*,3, D. G. Landblom{dagger} and J. S. Caton*

* Department of Animal and Range Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; and and {dagger} Dickinson Research Extension Center, Dickinson, ND 58601

2 Correspondence: 177 Hultz Hall (phone: 701-231-7660; fax: 701-231-7590; e-mail: glardy{at}ndsuext.nodak.edu).

Two experiments evaluated digestive and performance effects of field pea-based creep feed in nursing calf diets. In Exp.1, eight nursing steer calves (145 ± 27 kg initial BW) with ruminal cannulas were used to evaluate effects of supplementation and advancing season on dietary composition, intake, digestion, and ruminal fermentation characteristics. Treatments were unsupplemented control (CON) and field pea-based creep (SUP; 19.1% CP, DM basis) fed at 0.45% BW (DM basis) daily. Calves grazed native range with their dams from early July through early November. Periods were 24 d long and occurred in July (JUL), August (AUG), September (SEP), and October (OCT). Experiment 2 used 80 crossbred nursing calves, 48 calves in yr 1 and 32 calves in yr 2 (yr 1 = 144 ± 24 kg; yr 2 = 121 ± 20 kg initial BW), to evaluate effects of field pea-based creep on calf performance. Treatments included unsupplemented control (CON); field pea-based creep feeds containing either 8% (LS); or16% (HS) salt; and soybean meal/field pea-based creep containing (as-fed basis) 16% salt (HIPRO). Masticate samples from SUP calves in Exp.1 had greater CP (P = 0.05) than those from CON calves. Forage CP and ADIN decreased linearly with advancing season (P = 0.01 and 0.03, respectively). In vitro OM digestibility of diet masticate decreased from JUL to OCT (P < 0.01; 58.5 to 41.3%). Forage intake did not differ (P = 0.33) between treatments but increased linearly with advancing season (1.67, 1.90, 3.12, 3.38 kg/d for JUL, AUG, SEP, and OCT, respectively; P < 0.01). Milk intake (percentage of BW) did not differ (P = 0.56) between CON and SUP calves but decreased linearly (P < 0.01) with advancing season. Supplemented calves had greater (P = 0.03) total intake (g/kg of BW; forage + milk + creep) compared with CON calves. Treatment did not affect (P < 0.30) rate of in situ disappearance of forage or creep. Forage DM, CP, and creep DM disappearance rate decreased linearly (P ≤ 0.02) with advancing season. Supplementation decreased (P = 0.05) ruminal pH, whereas ruminal ammonia and VFA concentrations were greater (P ≤ 0.02) in SUP calves. In Exp. 2, creep-fed calves had greater ADG and final BW than CON calves (P < 0.01). Calves offered HS tended (P = 0.07) to have increased gain efficiency above CON than LS calves. Field peas can be used as an ingredient in creep feed to increase calf weight gain without negatively affecting ruminal fermentation and digestion.

Key Words: Digestibility • Field Pea • Forage • Intake • Nursing Calves • Ruminal Fermentation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. F. Liao, E. S. Vanzant, J. A. Boling, and J. C. Matthews
Identification and expression pattern of cationic amino acid transporter-1 mRNA in small intestinal epithelia of Angus steers at four production stages
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(3): 620 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. C. Gilbery, G. P. Lardy, S. A. Soto-Navarro, M. L. Bauer, and V. L. Anderson
Effect of field peas, chickpeas, and lentils on rumen fermentation, digestion, microbial protein synthesis, and feedlot performance in receiving diets for beef cattle
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2007; 85(11): 3045 - 3053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. J. Reed, G. P. Lardy, M. L. Bauer, M. Gibson, and J. S. Caton
Effects of season and inclusion of corn distillers dried grains with solubles in creep feed on intake, microbial protein synthesis and efficiency, ruminal fermentation, digestion, and performance of nursing calves grazing native range in southeastern North Dakota
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2006; 84(8): 2200 - 2212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. J. Reed, A. L. Gelvin, G. P. Lardy, M. L. Bauer, and J. S. Caton
Effect of creep feed supplementation and season on intake, microbial protein synthesis and efficiency, ruminal fermentation, digestion, and performance in nursing calves grazing native range in southeastern North Dakota
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2006; 84(2): 411 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Animal Science.