J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cassady, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cassady, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, R. N.
J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:3482-3485
© 2004 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL GENETICS

National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line Genetic Evaluation: A comparison of growth and carcass traits in terminal progeny1

J. P. Cassady*,2, O. W. Robison*, R. K. Johnson{dagger}, J. W. Mabry{ddagger}, L. L. Christian{ddagger}, M. D. Tokach§, R. K. Miller and R. N. Goodwin#

* Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; and {dagger} Department of Animal Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; and {ddagger} Department of Animal Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; and § Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; and Department of Animal Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843; and and # National Pork Board, Clive, IA 50325

2 Correspondence: 232B Polk Hall (phone: 919-359-0503; fax 919-515-7780; e-mail: joe_cassady{at}ncsu.edu).

The objective of this study was to compare growth and carcass traits of 1,252 progeny of six commercially available dam lines included in the National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line Evaluation Project. Lines compared included one maternal line supplied by each of American Diamond Swine Genetics (ADSG), Danbred NA (DB), two lines supplied by Monsanto Choice Genetics (DK and GPK347), Newsham Hybrids (NH), and Landrace x Large White females supplied by the National Swine Registry (NSR). All females were mated to DB, Duroc-Hampshire terminal sires. Traits analyzed were ADG from 56 to 115 kg live weight, days to 115 kg, backfat thickness measured at the 10th rib, carcass length, dressing percent, and 10th-rib LM area. Carcass traits were adjusted to a carcass weight of 85 kg. The statistical model included fixed effects of maternal line, sex, farrowing group, and finishing unit (farm). All two-way interactions among main effects were tested and removed from final models because they were not significant. In addition, because they were not significant, effects of farm and farrowing group were removed from models for carcass length and 10th-rib backfat thickness, and farm was removed from the model for LM area. Least squares means for ADG ranged from 0.74 to 0.79 kg/d. The GPK347 line had lower ADG and greater days to 115 kg than all other lines (P < 0.05). The ADSG (P < 0.05) and NH (P < 0.01) progeny had lower ADG than DK progeny. The DK line had the fewest days to 115 kg (P < 0.05). Progeny for the DB and NH lines had the least 10th-rib backfat, differing from ADSG, DK, and GPK347 (P < 0.05). Pigs from DB females had the greatest dressing percent, differing from ADSG, DK, GPK347, and NH (P < 0.05). The GPK347 had a lower dressing percent than all other lines (P < 0.05). Progeny of DB females had the greatest LM area, differing from ADSG, DK, GPK347, and NSR (P < 0.05). Offspring from ADSG and GPK347 had the smallest LM area; however, GPK347 and NSR did not differ. Differences in carcass length were statistically significant; however, actual differences were small. Economic weights for these traits relative to reproductive traits must be considered in integrated economic analyses to properly compare differences among lines in net economic value for specific markets.

Key Words: Carcass • Growth • Line Evaluation • Pigs




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. Bergsma, E. Kanis, M. W. A. Verstegen, and E. F. Knol
Genetic parameters and predicted selection results for maternal traits related to lactation efficiency in sows
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2008; 86(5): 1067 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. Serenius, K. J. Stalder, T. J. Baas, J. W. Mabry, R. N. Goodwin, R. K. Johnson, O. W. Robison, M. Tokach, and R. K. Miller
National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: A comparison of sow longevity and trait associations with sow longevity
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2590 - 2595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. M. Bender, M. T. See, D. J. Hanson, T. E. Lawrence, and J. P. Cassady
Correlated responses in growth, carcass, and meat quality traits to divergent selection for testosterone production in pigs
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2006; 84(6): 1331 - 1337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Animal Science.