J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaffrézic, F.
Right arrow Articles by Renand, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jaffrézic, F.
Right arrow Articles by Renand, G.
J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:3465-3473
© 2004 American Society of Animal Science

ANIMAL GENETICS

Use of structured antedependence models for the genetic analysis of growth curves1

F. Jaffrézic2, E. Venot, D. Laloë, A. Vinet and G. Renand

INRA Quantitative and Applied Genetics, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, France

2 Correspondence—e-mail: jaffrezic{at}dga2.jouy.inra.fr.

Growth curve analysis is an important issue for many agricultural and laboratory species, for both phenotypic and genetic studies. The aim of this paper is to present the use of a novel statistical approach, namely the structured antedependence (SAD) models, to deal with this issue. The basic idea of these models is that an observation at time t can be explained by the previous observations. These models are especially appropriate to deal with cumulative traits such as growth, as BW at age t clearly depends on BW measures at ages (t –1), (t –2), etc. These models were applied on an INRA experimental Charolais herd data set. The data comprised BW records for 560 cows born over an 11-yr period (from 1988 to 1998) from 60 sires and 369 dams. The proposed SAD models were compared with the well-known random regression (RR) models that are already widely used in various areas of longitudinal data analysis. It was found that the SAD models fit the growth process better with far fewer parameters than the RR models (9 instead of 16 covariance parameters for the phenotypic analysis, and 14 instead of 21 for the genetic analysis). Despite this smaller number of covariance parameters, the likelihood value was found to be much higher with the SAD vs. the RR models, with a difference of 262.9 for the phenotypic analysis with a quartic polynomial for the RR and 751.5 for the genetic analysis with a cubic polynomial for both the genetic and environmental parts of the RR model. The SAD models also proved to be better able to interpolate missing values. Heritability, genetic, and environmental correlation coefficients were estimated for weights from birth to adulthood. The structured antedependence models proved, in this study, to be very appropriate to model growth data in a parsimonious and flexible way.

Key Words: Beef Cattle • Genetic Analysis • Growth Curves • Random Regression Models • Structured Antedependence Models




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. P. L. Calus, L. L. G. Janss, and R. F. Veerkamp
Genotype by Environment Interaction for Somatic Cell Score Across Bulk Milk Somatic Cell Count and Days in Milk
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4846 - 4857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Animal Science.