| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
ANIMAL GENETICS |
,3
* MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Animal Production Research, Animal Breeding, Jokioinen, Finland; and
and
Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011-3150
2 Correspondence: 109 Kildee Hall (phone: 515-294-4103; fax: 515-294-5698; e-mail: timo.serenius{at}mtt.fi).
The objective of this study was to estimate direct and indirect selection potential for length of productive life and lifetime prolificacy in Finnish Large White and Landrace swine populations. To study the direct selection potential, the heritabilities of these traits were estimated. The genetic correlations of length of productive life and lifetime prolificacy with prolificacy traits and overall leg conformation were estimated to evaluate whether selection for these traits could indirectly improve measures of sow longevity. In addition, correlations between length of productive life, lifetime prolificacy, ADG, and backfat thickness were estimated. Records were used from Finnish purebred Landrace (n = 26,744) and Large White (n = 24,007) sows born on operations that perform on-farm production tests on all females. Heritabilities were estimated using both a survival analysis procedure and a linear model. Due to computational limitations, correlations were estimated with the linear model only. Estimated length of productive life heritabilities obtained from linear model analyses were less (0.05 to 0.10) than those obtained from survival analyses (0.16 to 0.19). This may be indicative of the superiority of survival analysis compared with linear model analysis methods when evaluating longevity or similar types of data. All the prolificacy traits were genetically correlated with length of productive life and lifetime prolificacy, and the correlations were greater than 0.13. These results indicate that selection for increased number of piglets weaned in the first litter and for short first farrowing interval is beneficial for sow longevity and also for sow’s lifetime prolificacy. The genetic correlations between length of productive life and leg conformation score also were favorable (0.32 in Landrace and 0.17 in Large White). The heritability estimates indicate that survival analysis is likely the most appropriate method of evaluating longevity traits in swine. Because of computational problems, simultaneous analysis of linear traits and longevity is not currently possible. More research is needed to develop methods for multiple linear and survival trait analyses.
Key Words: Genetic Correlation • Heritability • Lifetime Prolificacy • Longevity • Sow
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Tarres, J. P. Bidanel, A. Hofer, and V. Ducrocq Analysis of longevity and exterior traits on Large White sows in Switzerland J Anim Sci, November 1, 2006; 84(11): 2914 - 2924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Serenius, K. J. Stalder, T. J. Baas, J. W. Mabry, R. N. Goodwin, R. K. Johnson, O. W. Robison, M. Tokach, and R. K. Miller National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: A comparison of sow longevity and trait associations with sow longevity J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2590 - 2595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Serenius and K. J. Stalder Selection for sow longevity J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(13_suppl): E166 - E. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Arango, I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, M. Culbertson, and W. Herring Study of codes of disposal at different parities of Large White sows using a linear censored model J Anim Sci, September 1, 2005; 83(9): 2052 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
