| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
ANIMAL GENETICS |
Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908
4 Correspondence: A218 Animal Sciences (phone: 402-472-6406; fax: 402-472-6362; e-mail: mnielsen1{at}unl.edu).
Mouse populations differing in metabolic rate have been developed through selection for high (MH) and low (ML) heat loss, along with the unselected controls (MC). Objectives of the study were to compare the MH, ML, and MC lines for reproductive performance, pup survival, and metabolic hormones when reared at 12, 22, and 31°C, and to search for line x environment interactions. Conception and litter size were recorded on the parent generation mice introduced to the environments at 11 wk of age and bred after a 3-wk acclimatization period. Survival of pups (preweaning to 3 wk; postweaning from 3 to 9 wk of age) was measured with continuous exposure in the designated environment from birth to the time of measurement. Corticosterone, triiodothyronine (T3), and thyroxine (T4) serum concentrations were measured on the parent generation after producing litters and on the pup generation at 9 wk. No line x environment interaction was detected for conception rate, preweaning mortality, postweaning survival, pup weaning weight, or body temperature. There were no differences in conception rate among lines and environments. Environments affected survival of pups, but there were no line differences. Rectal body temperatures were greater for MH than ML mice, and MC mice were intermediate; body temperature of mice did not differ among the environments. Lines differed significantly in litter size only in the 22°C environment. No significant line differences were found for serum corticosterone or serum T3 or T4. Line x environment interaction was detected only for litter size and for serum corticosterone concentration in dams. Contrary to the other two lines, ML dam performance relative to MH and MC was not affected negatively by either of the thermal environments. Results from this study do not raise concern that selection to decrease maintenance requirements will produce livestock with any greater liability to cope and perform under an array of environmental temperatures.
Key Words: Ambient Temperature • Genotype x Environment Interaction • Metabolic Hormones • Mice • Mortality • Reproduction
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. M. McDonald and M. K. Nielsen Renewed selection for heat loss in mice: Direct responses and correlated responses in feed intake, body weight, litter size, and conception rate J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 658 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Xu, A. Buehner, J. Xu, T. Lambert, C. Nekl, M. K. Nielsen, and Y. Zhou A polymorphic glucocorticoid receptor in a mouse population may explain inherited altered stress response and increased anxiety-type behaviors FASEB J, November 1, 2006; 20(13): 2414 - 2416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Kgwatalala and M. K. Nielsen Performance of mouse lines divergently selected for heat loss when exposed to different environmental temperatures. II. Feed intake, growth, fatness, and body organs J Anim Sci, October 1, 2004; 82(10): 2884 - 2891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
