J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kane, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Keisler, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kane, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Keisler, D. H.
J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:283-291
© 2004 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL PRODUCTION

Effect of increasing levels of undegradable intake protein on metabolic and endocrine factors in estrous cycling beef heifers1,2

K. K. Kane*, D. E. Hawkins*,3, G. D. Pulsipher*,4, D. J. Denniston*,5, C. R. Krehbiel*,6, M. G. Thomas*, M. K. Petersen*, D. M. Hallford*, M. D. Remmenga{dagger}, A. J. Roberts{ddagger} and D. H. Keisler§

* Department of Animal and Range Sciences and and {dagger} University Statistics Center, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces 88003; and {ddagger} USDA-ARS, Fort Keogh LARRL, Miles City, MT 59301; and and § Department of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211

3 Correspondence: Box 30003, Dept. 3-I (phone: 505-646-4135; fax: 505-646-5441; e-mail: dhawkins{at}nmsu.edu).

Abstract

To determine the influence of three levels of undegradable intake protein (UIP) supplementation on metabolic and endocrine factors that influence reproduction, 23 yearling crossbred heifers (body condition score = 4.5 ± 0.5; initial BW = 362 ± 12 kg) were stratified by BW and assigned randomly to one of three supplements: 1) low UIP (1,135 g•heifer-1•d-1; 30% CP, 115 g UIP, n = 7); 2) mid UIP (1,135 g•heifer-1•d-1; 38% CP, 216 g UIP, n = 8); or 3) high UIP (1,135 g•heifer-1•d-1; 46% CP, 321 g UIP, n = 8). Heifers were estrually synchronized before initiation of supplementation. Supplement was individually fed daily for 30 to 32 d, at which time heifers were slaughtered (d 12 to 14 of the estrous cycle) and tissues collected. Heifers were fed a basal diet of sudan grass hay (6.0% CP) ad libitum. On d 28 of supplementation (d 10 of the estrous cycle), no differences were observed (P > 0.10) in serum insulin or IGF-I among treatments. At slaughter (d 10 to 12 of the estrous cycle), treatments did not influence corpus luteum weight, cerebral spinal fluid leptin, or IGFBP; serum estradiol-17ß, progesterone, leptin, IGF-I, and IGFBP; or anterior pituitary content of IGFBP (P > 0.10). Follicular fluid IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4 were greater in high-UIP heifers than low- or mid-UIP heifers on d 12 to 14 of the estrous cycle (P < 0.05). Basal serum LH concentrations and LH area under the curve (every 15 min for 240 min) did not differ (P > 0.10) following 28 d of supplementation (d 10 of the estrous cycle); however, basal serum FSH concentrations were greater (P = 0.06) in low- and mid- vs. high-UIP heifers (5.2 and 5.2 vs. 4.6 ng/mL, respectively), and FSH area under the curve was greater (P = 0.03) in low- vs. high-UIP heifers. At slaughter (d 12 to 14 of the estrous cycle), anterior pituitary LH and FSH content and steady-state mRNA encoding {alpha}, LHß, and GnRH receptor did not differ (P > 0.10) among treatments. However, FSHß mRNA was increased approximately twofold (P = 0.03) in mid vs. low UIP. In summary, low and mid levels of UIP supplements fed to estrous cycling beef heifers seemed to enhance pituitary expression and/or secretion of FSH relative to high levels of UIP. Moreover, high-UIP supplementation was associated with increased low-molecular-weight IGFBP compared with supplementation of low and mid levels of UIP. These data suggest that differing levels of UIP supplementation may alter pituitary and ovarian function, thereby influencing reproductive performance in beef heifers.

Key Words: Beef Heifers • Follicle-Stimulating Hormone • Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I • Insulin • Luteinizing Hormone • Undegradable Intake Protein




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. L. Martin, A. S. Cupp, R. J. Rasby, Z. C. Hall, and R. N. Funston
Utilization of dried distillers grains for developing beef heifers
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2007; 85(9): 2298 - 2303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. J. Reed, M. R. O'Neil, G. P. Lardy, K. A. Vonnahme, L. P. Reynolds, and J. S. Caton
Effect of undegradable intake protein supplementation on intake, digestion, microbial efficiency, in situ disappearance, and plasma hormones and metabolites in steers fed low-quality grass hay
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 1092 - 1101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. N. Roybal, S. Yang, C.-W. Sun, D. Hurtado, D. L. Vander Jagt, T. M. Townes, and S. F. Abcouwer
Homocysteine Increases the Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor by a Mechanism Involving Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Transcription Factor ATF4
J. Biol. Chem., April 9, 2004; 279(15): 14844 - 14852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Animal Science.