J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stella, A.
Right arrow Articles by Boettcher, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stella, A.
Right arrow Articles by Boettcher, P. J.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:2171-2178
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Estimation of variances for gametic effects on litter size in Yorkshire and Landrace swine

A. Stella*, K. J. Stalder{dagger}, A. M. Saxton{dagger} and P. J. Boettcher{ddagger},1

* CERSA-Fondazione Parco Tecnologico Padano and and {ddagger} Istituto Biologia e Biotecnologia Agraria, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Segrate, Italy 20090; and and {dagger} Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996-4574

1 Correspondence: Palazzo LITA, Via Fratelli Cervi 93, 20090 Segrate (phone: +39 0221013508; fax: +39 0226412135; E-mail: boettch{at}ibba.cnr.it).

The objective of this study was to test for effects of gametic imprinting on litter size in swine by estimating variances for parent-specific gametic effects. Data were 64,047 and 137,009 multiparous records of number born alive for the U.S. Landrace and Yorkshire breeds, respectively. The statistical model included fixed effects of parity number and herd, and random effects of herd-year-season, mate, permanent environment, animal (additive genetic), and either maternal or paternal gametes. A Bayesian approach that used Gibbs sampling to obtain posterior distributions was employed. To aid in the interpretation of results, the Landrace data structure was used to simulate data with and without effects of imprinting. Analyses of the simulated records indicated that the model applied was capable of detecting effects of imprinting when such effects were present. Small, but non-zero, estimates of gametic variances were obtained when no imprinting was simulated. Estimates of the proportion of total variance accounted for by paternally transmitted gametes were 0.8 and 0.9% for Landrace and Yorkshires, respectively. These estimates were different from zero, but were similar to the results observed for data simulated without an imprinting effect. Corresponding results for maternally transmitted gametes were 1.6% for Landrace and 0.8% for Yorkshires. The estimate for Landrace was significantly greater than that observed for Yorkshires and for the simulations without a true effect and suggested the presence of a non-Mendelian genetic influence on litter size. Paternally imprinted genes are a plausible reason for the observed results. Assuming that the effect observed was due to paternal imprinting at a single biallelic locus, the substitution effect of the superior allele could be greater than 0.7 piglets per litter. Identification of a genetic marker for such an allele would be useful in marker-assisted selection of females. Other possible explanations exist for the increased gametic variance in the Landrace breed, but these explanations (such as maternal or cytoplasmic effects) may be less likely than paternal imprinting.

Key Words: Gametes • Imprinting • Litter Size • Pigs




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. M. Patten and D. Haig
Reciprocally Imprinted Genes and the Response to Selection on One Sex
Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1389 - 1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.