|
|
||||||||


,3


* Roslin Institute, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, U.K.;
and
Institut de Recerca i TecnologiaAgroalimentàries, Area de Producció Animal Centre UdL-IRTA, Lleida 25198, Spain;
and
Sygen International PLC, University of Cambridge, Department of Pathology, Cambridge CB2 1QP, U.K.;
and
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala S-751 24, Sweden; and
and
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193 Catalunya, Spain.
2 Correspondence phone: +44-131-5274460; fax: +44-131-4400434; E-mail: dj.dekoning{at}bbsrc.ac.uk.
In commercial livestock populations, QTL detection methods often use existing half-sib family structures and ignore additional relationships within and between families. We reanalyzed the data from a large QTL confirmation experiment with 10 pig lines and 10 chromosome regions using identity-by-descent (IBD) scores and variance component analyses. The IBD scores were obtained using a Monte Carlo Markov Chain method, as implemented in the LOKI software, and were used to model a putative QTL in a mixed animal model. The analyses revealed 61 QTL at a nominal 5% level (out of 650 tests). Twenty-seven QTL mapped to areas where QTL have been reported, and eight of these exceeded the threshold to claim confirmed linkage (P < 0.01). Forty-two of the putative QTL were detected previously using half-sib analyses, whereas 46 QTL previously identified by half-sib analyses could not be confirmed using the variance component approach. Some of the differences could be traced back to the underlying assumptions between the two methods. Using a deterministic approach to estimate IBD scores on a subset of the data gave very similar results to LOKI. We have demonstrated the feasibility of applying variance component QTL analysis to a large amount of data, equivalent to a genome scan. In many situations, the deterministic IBD approach offers a fast alternative to LOKI.
Key Words: Best Linear Unbiased Prediction Genomes Least Squares Pigs Quantitative Trait Loci Variance Components
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. J. van Wijk, H. Buschbell, B. Dibbits, S.C. Liefers, B. Harlizius, H. C. M. Heuven, E. F. Knol, H. Bovenhuis, and M. A. M. Groenen Variance component analysis of quantitative trait loci for pork carcass composition and meat quality on SSC4 and SSC11 J Anim Sci, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 22 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. van Wijk, B. Dibbits, E. E. Baron, A. D. Brings, B. Harlizius, M. A. M. Groenen, E. F. Knol, and H. Bovenhuis Identification of quantitative trait loci for carcass composition and pork quality traits in a commercial finishing cross J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(4): 789 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Estelle, A. Mercade, J. L. Noguera, M. Perez-Enciso, C. Ovilo, A. Sanchez, and J. M. Folch Effect of the porcine IGF2-intron3-G3072A substitution in an outbred Large White population and in an Iberian x Landrace cross J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2723 - 2728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Vidal, J. L. Noguera, M. Amills, L. Varona, M. Gil, N. Jimenez, G. Davalos, J. M. Folch, and A. Sanchez Identification of carcass and meat quality quantitative trait loci in a Landrace pig population selected for growth and leanness J Anim Sci, February 1, 2005; 83(2): 293 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Varona, O. Vidal, R. Quintanilla, M. Gil, A. Sanchez, J. M. Folch, M. Hortos, M. A. Rius, M. Amills, and J. L. Noguera Bayesian analysis of quantitative trait loci for boar taint in a Landrace outbred population J Anim Sci, February 1, 2005; 83(2): 301 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Szyda, Z. Liu, F. Reinhardt, and R. Reents Estimation of Quantitative Trait Loci Parameters for Milk Production Traits in German Holstein Dairy Cattle Population J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2005; 88(1): 356 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |