J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by McAllister, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by McAllister, T. A.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:2145-2154
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Effects of moisture, roller setting, and saponin-based surfactant on barley processing, ruminal degradation of barley, and growth performance by feedlot steers1

Y. Wang*,2, D. Greer{dagger} and T. A. McAllister*

* Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1and and {dagger} Agrichem Inc., Anoka, MN 55303-0845

2 Correspondence: P.O. Box 3000 (phone: 403 317-3340; fax: 403 382-3156; E-mail: wangy{at}agr.gc.ca).

Two experiments were conducted to study the effects of six processing techniques for barley grain in a 3 x 2 factorial arrangement of grain conditions and roller settings on ruminal degradation of the grain (Exp. 1) and on growth performance by 138 feedlot steers (n = 23 per treatment; Exp. 2). Dry barley (11% moisture, D barley), barley tempered to 20% moisture (M barley), and barley tempered with 60 mL/t of surfactant-based tempering agent (GrainPrep, Agrichem, Inc., Anoka, MN; MS barley), were each rolled at two roller settings selected from preliminary tests. The settings selected for the study were RD, the roller position that had yielded optimally processed D barley, and RMS, the setting that had yielded optimally processed MS barley. Setting RMS was tighter than RD. Barley rolled at the RMS setting was more extensively processed (i.e., had a lower [P < 0.001] processing index, PI), had lighter (P < 0.001) volume weight, thinner (P < 0.001) kernels, and fewer (P < 0.001) whole kernels compared with setting RD. Tempering did not affect (P > 0.05) PI, percentage of whole kernels, or kernel thickness at either roller setting. The processing characteristics of tempered barley were unaffected (P > 0.05) by surfactant. The extent of in situ DM disappearance (ISDMD) was higher (P < 0.01) in grain rolled at setting RMS compared with RD. At both roller settings, tempering reduced (P < 0.05) ISDMD between 4 and 24 h of ruminal incubation. Steers fed RMS-rolled barley had lower (P < 0.001) DMI, slightly lower (P = 0.084) ADG, but increased (P < 0.05) gain:feed (G:F) compared with steers fed RD-rolled barley. Tempering did not affect (P > 0.05) ADG, DMI, or G:F during backgrounding, but improved (P < 0.01) these variables during finishing. Surfactant improved (P < 0.05) G:F but not DMI or ADG. The improvement in G:F was most pronounced when setting RMS was used. The optimal PI values calculated from performance data were numerically greater for the backgrounding diet than for the finishing diet. Steers fed M or MS barley had heavier (P < 0.01) hot carcasses and thicker (P < 0.05) fat cover but lower (P < 0.05) dressing percentages than steers fed D. When the feed barley was rolled at setting RMS, steers fed MS barley produced heavier (P < 0.05) carcasses than those fed M. Tempering with or without surfactant increased performance by feedlot steers compared with not tempering. Diet composition and degree of barley processing mediated this effect.

Key Words: Barley • Feedlots • Growth • Processing • Rumen Digestion • Surfactants




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. C. Hissa, I. M. Vasconcelos, A. F. U. Carvalho, V. L. R. Nogueira, P. Cascon, A. S. L. Antunes, G. R. de Macedo, and V. M. M. Melo
Novel surfactant proteins are involved in the structure and stability of foam nests from the frog Leptodactylus vastus
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2008; 211(16): 2707 - 2711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. A. Zinn, E. G. Alverez, M. Montano, and J. Salinas-Chavira
Influence of dry-rolling and tempering agent addition during the steam-flaking of sorghum grain on its feeding value for feedlot cattle
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(4): 916 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. J. Sindt, J. S. Drouillard, E. C. Titgemeyer, S. P. Montgomery, E. R. Loe, B. E. Depenbusch, and P. H. Walz
Influence of steam-flaked corn moisture level and density on the site and extent of digestibility and feeding value for finishing cattle
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2006; 84(2): 424 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. J. Sindt, J. S. Drouillard, S. P. Montgomery, and E. R. Loe
Factors influencing characteristics of steam-flaked corn and utilization by finishing cattle
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 154 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. I. Szasz, C. W. Hunt, O. A. Turgeon Jr., P. A. Szasz, and K. A. Johnson
Effects of pasteurization of potato slurry by-product fed in corn-or barley-based beef finishing diets
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2806 - 2814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
W. L. Bengochea, G. P. Lardy, M. L. Bauer, and S. A. Soto-Navarro
Effect of grain processing degree on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and performance characteristics of steers fed medium-concentrate growing diets
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2815 - 2825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.