J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soder, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stout, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soder, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stout, W. L.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:1603-1610
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Effect of soil type and fertilization level on mineral concentration of pasture: Potential relationships to ruminant performance and health

K. J. Soder1 and W. L. Stout

USDA, ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, University Park, PA 16802-3702

1 Correspondence:
Bldg. 3702, Curtin Rd. (fax: 814-865-0935; E-mail:
ksoder{at}psu.edu).

A three-year study was conducted to measure the effects of varying levels of dairy slurry application on mineral concentration of forages from three soils types. Slurry was applied to orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata [L.] cv. Pennlate) growing in 60-cm diameter drainage lysimeters to measure the effect of four levels of slurry (urine and feces) N application (0, 168, 336, and 672 kg of N•ha-1•yr-1) on mineral (P, K, Ca, Mg) concentration of the forage on three soil types (Hagerstown, Hartleton, and Rayne). The results were then related to potential effects on performance and health of grazing ruminants. Forage P was not affected by slurry application (mean = 0.46% of DM). Forage grown on the Hartleton soil had the highest (P < 0.05) P concentration (0.6% of DM). Forage K increased (P < 0.05) with increased slurry (2.50, 2.85, 3.22, and 3.45% of DM, respectively), and was lowest (P < 0.05) for forage grown on the Rayne soil (2.69% of DM). Forage Ca decreased (P < 0.05) with increased slurry (0.59, 0.56, 0.50, and 0.49% of DM, respectively) and was not affected by soil type. Forage Mg also decreased (P < 0.05) with increased slurry (0.25, 0.24, 0.24, and 0.23% of DM, respectively), and was highest (P < 0.05) for the Hartleton soil (0.27% of DM). The variable results in mineral concentration associated with soil type may have, in part, been due to prior soil fertility. The P and Mg concentrations in all treatments were generally adequate for grazing ruminants. The K concentrations were high in relation to NRC recommendations for prepartum dairy cows, which might predispose them to milk fever. The Ca concentrations were inadequate for lactating dairy cows. Comprehensive forage testing and diet formulation based on individual farm situations is the best strategy to ensure proper mineral nutrition of grazing animals.

Key Words: Fertilization • Grazing • Health • Mineral • Pasture • Ruminants




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
G. F. Tremblay, H. Brassard, G. Belanger, P. Seguin, R. Drapeau, A. Bregard, R. Michaud, and G. Allard
Dietary Cation Anion Difference of Five Cool-Season Grasses
Agron. J., March 2, 2006; 98(2): 339 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. Adeli, D. E. Rowe, and J. J. Read
Effects of Soil Type on Bermudagrass Response to Broiler Litter Application
Agron. J., January 5, 2006; 98(1): 148 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.