|
|
||||||||
USDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933
1 Correspondence: P.O. Box 166 (phone: 402-762-4248; fax: 402-762-4209; E-mail:
williams{at}email.marc.usda.gov).
Component models were developed to predict the net efficiency of ME utilization for gain in cattle and to predict daily gain using recovered energy as the input. These models were integrated into a single model to predict daily gain from ME available for gain. One component model predicts the net efficiency of ME utilization for gain using constant partial net efficiencies of 0.2 and 0.75 for ME retention as protein and fat, respectively. This model predicts net efficiency of ME utilization for gain as a function of the ratio of the energy recovered in protein to the total energy recovered. The other component model predicts daily gain as a function of recovered energy and is represented by a system of ordinary differential equations that are numerically integrated on a daily basis. This model was developed by reformulating the equations in a published body composition model that uses daily gain to predict composition of gain since recovered energy is a function of gain and composition of gain. The equations in the two component models interact in that net efficiency is used to predict recovered energy from ME for gain, and in turn, recovered energy is used to predict gain in empty BW, which determines net efficiency through composition of gain. The numeric integration procedure provides an iterative solution for net efficiency. Simulated response of net efficiency for Hereford x Angus steers at 400 kg of empty BW decreased from 0.57 to 0.52 on diets with ME densities of 3.1 and 2.6 Mcal/kg of DM, and restricting the lower-quality diet to 75% of ad libitum intake resulted in a simulated net efficiency of 0.47. These responses in net efficiency were shown to be a result of composition of gain, with leaner gains resulting in lower net efficiencies.
Key Words: Beef Cattle Energy Metabolism Models Weight Gain
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. C. P. Castro Bulle, P. V. Paulino, A. C. Sanches, and R. D. Sainz Growth, carcass quality, and protein and energy metabolism in beef cattle with different growth potentials and residual feed intakes J Anim Sci, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 928 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. M. R. Fernandes, K. T. Resende, L. O. Tedeschi, J. S. Fernandes Jr., H. M. Silva, G. E. Carstens, T. T. Berchielli, I. A. M. A. Teixeira, and L. Akinaga Energy and protein requirements for maintenance and growth of Boer crossbred kids J Anim Sci, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 1014 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Williams, G. L. Bennett, T. G. Jenkins, L. V. Cundiff, and C. L. Ferrell Using simulation models to predict feed intake: Phenotypic and genetic relationships between observed and predicted values in cattle J Anim Sci, June 1, 2006; 84(6): 1310 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Williams Technical Note: A dynamic model to predict the composition of fat-free matter gains in cattle J Anim Sci, June 1, 2005; 83(6): 1262 - 1266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Williams and T. G. Jenkins A dynamic model of metabolizable energy utilization in growing and mature cattle. I. Metabolizable energy utilization for maintenance and support metabolism J Anim Sci, June 1, 2003; 81(6): 1371 - 1381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Williams and T. G. Jenkins A dynamic model of metabolizable energy utilization in growing and mature cattle. III. Model evaluation J Anim Sci, June 1, 2003; 81(6): 1390 - 1398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |