HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chen, P. Articles by Mabry, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chen, P. Articles by Mabry, J. W.

Evaluation of strategies for selection for lean growth rate in pigs¹

P. Chen^*, T. J. Baas^*,2, J. C. M. Dekkers^*, K. J. Koehler and J. W. Mabry^*

^* Departments of Animal Science and and Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames 50011

² Correspondence:
109 Kildee Hall (phone: 515-294-6728; fax: 515-294-5698; E-mail:
tjbaas{at}iastate.edu).

Lean growth rate (LGR) in pigs is a nonlinear biological function of growth rate and lean quantity. According to animal breeding theory, genetic progress for LGR is maximized with selection on a linear index of its component traits, but selection on direct EBV for LGR is also common. In this study, the performance of five criteria for selection on estimated LGR in pigs was evaluated through simulation over five generations: linear indexes of multiple-trait EBV of component traits with or without updating index weights in each generation; a nonlinear index of multiple-trait EBV of component traits; and direct selection on EBV for LGR from a single-trait model or a multiple-trait model that included LGR and component traits. The nonlinear index yielded the highest response in LGR in Generation 5, but the linear index with updating performed almost as well. Not updating weights for the linear index reduced response in LGR by 1.1% in Generation 5 (P < 0.05). Direct selection on single-trait EBV for LGR yielded the lowest responses in Generation 5. Direct selection on EBV for LGR from a multiple-trait animal model yielded a 3.1% greater response in LGR in Generation 5 than direct selection on EBV for LGR based on a single-trait animal model (P < 0.05), but yielded a 1.9% lower response than the nonlinear index. Although differences in response in LGR were limited, alternative selection criteria resulted in substantially different responses in component traits. Linear index selection for LGR placed more emphasis on lean quantity, whereas direct selection for LGR emphasized growth rate. Based on the relative changes in the responses in LGR, selection for estimated LGR based on a nonlinear index or a linear index with updating is recommended for use in the swine industry.

Key Words: Growth Rate • Lean • Pigs • Selection Index

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Mambrini, F. Medale, M.P. Sanchez, B. Recalde, B. Chevassus, L. Labbe, E. Quillet, and T. Boujard Selection for growth in brown trout increases feed intake capacity without affecting maintenance and growth requirements J Anim Sci, October 1, 2004; 82(10): 2865 - 2875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]