J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, E. R.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:1126-1135
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

The growth performance of the progeny of two swine sire lines reared under different floor space allowances

D. N. Hamilton1, M. Ellis*,1, B. F. Wolter*, A. P. Schinckel{dagger} and E. R. Wilson{ddagger}

* Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; and {dagger} Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907; and and {ddagger} PIC USA, Franklin, KY 42134

1 Correspondence:
216 Animal Sciences Laboratory, 1207 W. Gregory Dr. (phone: 217-333-6455; fax: 217-333-7861; E-mail:
m-ellis7{at}uiuc.edu).

A total of 736 pigs was used in a study with a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial arrangement to investigate the effects of and interactions between sire line (Line A vs. B), floor space (unrestricted vs. restricted), and gender (barrow vs. gilt) on growth performance, BW, and protein and estimated lipid accretion curves from 40 to 120 kg of BW. Pigs were by eight Line-A and nine Line-B sires mated with PIC C22 dams. Line A was of Pietrain ancestry and Line B was a synthetic line. The unrestricted floor space treatment consisted of small groups (four pigs) with 0.93 m2/pig of floor space for the entire grow-finish period. Pigs in the restricted floor space were in larger groups (12 pigs) with 0.37 and 0.56 m2/pig of floor space for the grower and finisher phases, respectively. Pigs were given ad libitum access to a three-phase dietary program, and one and three nipple waterers were available in the groups of 4 and 12 pigs, respectively. No sire line x floor space interactions were found for any of the traits measured. Line A pigs grew more slowly (50 g/d, P < 0.05), took longer (4.1 d, P < 0.05) to reach harvest weight (120.3 kg), and had similar feed intakes, but a lower gain:feed ratio (2.8%, P < 0.05) than Line B pigs. Line A pigs had greater longissimus muscle depth (P < 0.05) and estimated protein accretion rate (P < 0.05) than Line B pigs, but Line A and Line B pigs had a similar estimated percentage of lipid-free soft tissue. Pigs reared in the restricted floor space grew more slowly (105 g/d, P < 0.05) and consumed less feed (280 g/d, P < 0.05) but had a similar (P > 0.05) gain:feed ratio to pigs reared in the unrestricted floor space. Pigs reared in the unrestricted floor space had greater (P < 0.05) predicted protein and lipid accretion rates throughout the growth period than pigs reared in the restricted floor space. Differences between genders for growth traits and carcass measurements were in agreement with previous research. The differences in growth performance, carcass measures, and compositional growth curves between these two sire lines were similar in the two floor spaces.

Key Words: Floor Space • Growth • Pigs • Sires




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
A. P. Schinckel, M. E. Einstein, S. Jungst, C. Booher, and S. Newman
Evaluation of Different Mixed Model Nonlinear Functions to Describe the Body Weight Growth of Pigs of Different Sire and Dam Lines
Professional Animal Scientist, June 1, 2009; 25(3): 307 - 324.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
A. P. Schinckel, M. E. Einstein, S. Jungst, C. Booher, and S. Newman
Evaluation of the Growth of Backfat Depth, Loin Depth, and Carcass Weight for Different Sire and Dam Lines
Professional Animal Scientist, June 1, 2009; 25(3): 325 - 344.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
A. P. Schinckel, M. E. Einstein, S. Jungst, C. Booher, and S. Newman
Evaluation of Different Mixed Model Nonlinear Functions to Describe the Feed Intakes of Pigs of Different Sire and Dam Lines
Professional Animal Scientist, June 1, 2009; 25(3): 345 - 359.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. G. Young, M. D. Tokach, F. X. Aherne, S. S. Dritz, R. D. Goodband, J. L. Nelssen, and T. M. Loughin
Effect of space allowance during rearing and selection criteria on performance of gilts over three parities in a commercial swine production system
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2008; 86(11): 3181 - 3193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. P. Schinckel, D. C. Mahan, T. G. Wiseman, and M. E. Einstein
Growth of protein, moisture, lipid, and ash of two genetic lines of barrows and gilts from twenty to one hundred twenty-five kilograms of body weight
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 460 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. Lebret, M. C. Meunier-Salaun, A. Foury, P. Mormede, E. Dransfield, and J. Y. Dourmad
Influence of rearing conditions on performance, behavioral, and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter handling, carcass traits, and meat quality
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2436 - 2447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. C. Brumm
The effect of space allocation on barrow and gilt performance
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2004; 82(8): 2460 - 2466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.