J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Platter, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Platter, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. C.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:984-996
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Effects of repetitive use of hormonal implants on beef carcass quality, tenderness, and consumer ratings of beef palatability1,2

W. J. Platter, J. D. Tatum3, K. E. Belk, J. A. Scanga and G. C. Smith

Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1171

3 Correspondence:
phone: 970-491-6530; fax: 970-491-5326; E-mail:
dtatum{at}lamar.colostate.edu.

Effects of repetitive use of anabolic implants on beef carcass quality, tenderness, and consumer ratings for palatability were investigated using crossbred steer calves (n = 550). Steers from five ranches were randomly allocated to one of 10 different lifetime implant strategies or to a nonimplanted control group. Cattle were implanted at some or all of five phases of production (branding, weaning, backgrounding, feedlot entry, or reimplant time). Carcasses from the control group had higher (P < 0.05) marbling scores than carcasses from steers in all other treatment groups. Implanting steers at branding, weaning, or backgrounding vs. not implanting steers at these production stages did not affect (P > 0.05) marbling scores. Steers implanted twice during their lifetime produced carcasses with higher (P < 0.05) marbling scores than did steers receiving a total of four or five implants. Steaks obtained from carcasses in the control group had lower (P < 0.05) shear force values and were rated by consumers as more desirable (P < 0.05) for tenderness like/dislike than steaks obtained from carcasses in all other treatment groups. Implanting steers at branding or weaning production stages did not affect (P > 0.05) steak shear force values, consumer ratings for like/dislike of steak tenderness, or percentage of consumers rating overall eating quality of steaks as satisfactory. Implanting steers at backgrounding vs. not implanting steers at this production stage increased (P < 0.05) steak shear force values, but did not influence (P > 0.05) consumer ratings for like/dislike of steak tenderness or percentage of consumers rating overall eating quality of steaks as satisfactory. Steaks from nonimplanted steers were rated as more desirable (P < 0.05) for overall eating quality than steaks from steers implanted two, three, four, or five times. Use of implants increased (P < 0.05) average daily gain by 11.8 to 20.5% from weaning to harvest compared with nonimplanted controls. Implant strategies increased (P < 0.05) hot carcass weight of steers by 8.9 to 13.8% compared with the control group. Use of implants also increased (P < 0.05) longissimus muscle area and decreased (P < 0.05) estimated percentages of kidney/pelvic/heart fat, but did not affect (P > 0.05) dressing percentage or adjusted fat thickness. Our findings suggest that beef quality, palatability, and production characteristics are influenced by lifetime implant protocols.

Key Words: Beef • Carcasses • Growth Promoters • Palatability • Tenderness




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. A. Schneider, J. D. Tatum, T. E. Engle, and T. C. Bryant
Effects of heifer finishing implants on beef carcass traits and longissimus tenderness
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 2019 - 2030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. R. Smith, S. K. Duckett, M. J. Azain, R. N. Sonon Jr., and T. D. Pringle
The effect of anabolic implants on intramuscular lipid deposition in finished beef cattle
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 430 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. J. McPhee, J. W. Oltjen, T. R. Famula, and R. D. Sainz
Meta-analysis of factors affecting carcass characteristics of feedlot steers
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2006; 84(11): 3143 - 3154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
W. T. Choat, J. A. Paterson, B. M. Rainey, M. C. King, G. C. Smith, K. E. Belk, and R. J. Lipsey
The effects of cattle sex on carcass characteristics and longissimus muscle palatability
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2006; 84(7): 1820 - 1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
W. J. Platter, J. D. Tatum, K. E. Belk, S. R. Koontz, P. L. Chapman, and G. C. Smith
Effects of marbling and shear force on consumers' willingness to pay for beef strip loin steaks
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 890 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
W. J. Platter, J. D. Tatum, K. E. Belk, P. L. Chapman, J. A. Scanga, and G. C. Smith
Relationships of consumer sensory ratings, marbling score, and shear force value to consumer acceptance of beef strip loin steaks
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2003; 81(11): 2741 - 2750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.