HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fonseca, S. Articles by Maltin, C. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fonseca, S. Articles by Maltin, C. A.

Slow fiber cluster pattern in pig longissimus thoracis muscle: Implications for myogenesis

Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn Aberdeen, AB21 9SB, U.K.

⁴ Correspondence:
phone: +44 1224 716673; fax: +44 1224 716687; E-mail:
c.maltin{at}rri.sari.ac.uk).

Recent evidence implicates fiber type proportions as playing a role in meat eating quality, and in pigs it has been suggested that the slow oxidative fibers contribute to both juiciness and tenderness. The fiber distribution in pigs is different from that found in most other species, in which the various types of skeletal muscle fiber are distributed in a "checkerboard" pattern, because in pigs the slow oxidative fibers have a clustered distribution. The initial processes leading to fiber clustering are likely to occur during myogenesis, but the precise mechanistic aetiology of this patterning and whether the slow oxidative fiber clusters occur in a random or ordered fashion is unknown. In the present study longissimus thoracis muscle from Large White crossbred pigs was sampled at the 10th rib, 48 h postmortem. Transverse cryo-sections were cut and histochemically stained to allow the identification of the main muscle fiber types: slow oxidative, fast glycolytic, and fast oxidative glycolytic. Images of the sections were captured and analyzed using point processes and Voronoi Tesselations to examine the randomness and spatial distribution of the clusters of slow oxidative fibers found in pig longissimus thoracis muscle. The results showed that an assumption of complete spatial randomness can be rejected and that a mathematical model incorporating a minimum distance of 1.7 to 2.0 µm between cluster centers produced fiber patterns similar to those observed in the original transverse sections of the muscle. In addition, if it assumed that the central fiber in each cluster is derived from primary myoblast progenitors, these results suggest that there may be some degree of repulsion between the primary fibers during the initial stages of cluster formation. The mechanistic basis of such repulsion is not clear, but it is speculated that secreted factors, such as sonic hedgehog or myostatin may play a role.

Key Words: Meat Quality • Muscle Fibers • Simulation Models • Spatial Distribution • Stochastic Processes