J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greiner, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wheeler, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greiner, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wheeler, T. L.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:676-682
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

The relationship between ultrasound measurements and carcass fat thickness and longissimus muscle area in beef cattle

S. P. Greiner*,1, G. H. Rouse*, D. E. Wilson*, L. V. Cundiff{ddagger} and T. L. Wheeler{ddagger}

* Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011 and and {ddagger} Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, USDA, ARS, Clay Center, NE 68933

1 Correspondence and present address:
Dept. of Animal and Poultry Sci., Virginia Tech, 366 Litton-Reaves Hall, Blacksburg 24061 (phone: 540-231-9159; fax: 540-231-3713; E-mail:
sgreiner{at}vt.edu).

Five hundred thirty-four steers were evaluated over a 2-yr period to determine the accuracy of ultrasonic estimates of carcass 12th-rib fat thickness (CFAT) and longissimus muscle area (CLMA). Within 5 d before slaughter, steers were ultrasonically measured for 12th-rib fat thickness (UFAT) and longissimus muscle area (ULMA) using an Aloka 500V real-time ultrasound machine equipped with a 17.2-cm, 3.5-MHz linear transducer. Overall, correlation coefficients between ultrasound and carcass fat and longissimus muscle area were 0.89 and 0.86, respectively. Correlations for UFAT with CFAT were similar between years (0.86 and 0.90), whereas the relationship between ULMA and CLMA was stronger in yr 1 (r = 0.91; n = 282) than in yr 2 (r = 0.79; n = 252). Differences between ultrasonic and carcass measurements were expressed on both an actual (FDIFF and RDIFF) and absolute (FDEV and RDEV) basis. Mean FDIFF and RDIFF indicated that ultrasound underestimated CFAT by 0.06 cm and overestimated CLMA by 0.71 cm2 across both years. Overall mean FDEV and RDEV, which are indications of the average error rate, were 0.16 cm and 3.39 cm2, respectively. Analysis of year effects revealed that FDIFF, FDEV, and RDEV were greater (P < 0.01) in magnitude in yr 1. Further analysis of FDEV indicated that leaner (CFAT < 0.51 cm) cattle were overestimated and that fatter (CFAT > 1.02 cm) cattle were underestimated with ultrasound. Similarly, steers with small CLMA (<71.0 cm2) were overestimated, and steers with large CLMA (>90.3 cm2) were underestimated. The thickness of CFAT had an effect (P < 0.05) on the error of UFAT and ULMA measurements, with leaner animals being more accurately evaluated for both traits. Standard errors of prediction (SEP) adjusted for bias of ultrasound measurements were 0.20 cm and 4.49 cm2 for UFAT and ULMA, respectively. Differences in SEP were observed for ULMA, but not UFAT, by year. These results indicate that ultrasound can be an accurate estimator of carcass traits in live cattle when measurements are taken by an experienced, well-trained technician, with only small differences in accuracy between years.

Key Words: Accuracy • Beef Cattle • Carcass Composition • Ultrasound




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Teixeira, M. Joy, and R. Delfa
In vivo estimation of goat carcass composition and body fat partition by real-time ultrasonography
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2369 - 2376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
F. R. B. Ribeiro, L. O. Tedeschi, J. R. Stouffer, and G. E. Carstens
Technical note: A novel technique to assess internal body fat of cattle by using real-time ultrasound
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(3): 763 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
K. R. Smith, S. K. Duckett, M. J. Azain, R. N. Sonon Jr., and T. D. Pringle
The effect of anabolic implants on intramuscular lipid deposition in finished beef cattle
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 430 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
S. R. Silva, J. J. Afonso, V. A. Santos, A. Monteiro, C. M. Guedes, J. M. T. Azevedo, and A. Dias-da-Silva
In vivo estimation of sheep carcass composition using real-time ultrasound with two probes of 5 and 7.5 MHz and image analysis
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2006; 84(12): 3433 - 3439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
U. J. Schroder and R. Staufenbiel
Invited Review: Methods to Determine Body Fat Reserves in the Dairy Cow with Special Regard to Ultrasonographic Measurement of Backfat Thickness
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
P. B. Wall, G. H. Rouse, D. E. Wilson, R. G. Tait Jr., and W. D. Busby
Use of ultrasound to predict body composition changes in steers at 100 and 65 days before slaughter
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2004; 82(6): 1621 - 1629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
S. P. Greiner, G. H. Rouse, D. E. Wilson, L. V. Cundiff, and T. L. Wheeler
Prediction of retail product weight and percentage using ultrasound and carcass measurements in beef cattle
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2003; 81(7): 1736 - 1742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.