| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
* Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011 and
and
Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, USDA, ARS, Clay Center, NE 68933
1 Correspondence and present address:
Dept. of Animal and Poultry Sci., Virginia Tech, 366 Litton-Reaves Hall, Blacksburg 24061 (phone: 540-231-9159; fax: 540-231-3713; E-mail:
sgreiner{at}vt.edu).
Five hundred thirty-four steers were evaluated over a 2-yr period to determine the accuracy of ultrasonic estimates of carcass 12th-rib fat thickness (CFAT) and longissimus muscle area (CLMA). Within 5 d before slaughter, steers were ultrasonically measured for 12th-rib fat thickness (UFAT) and longissimus muscle area (ULMA) using an Aloka 500V real-time ultrasound machine equipped with a 17.2-cm, 3.5-MHz linear transducer. Overall, correlation coefficients between ultrasound and carcass fat and longissimus muscle area were 0.89 and 0.86, respectively. Correlations for UFAT with CFAT were similar between years (0.86 and 0.90), whereas the relationship between ULMA and CLMA was stronger in yr 1 (r = 0.91; n = 282) than in yr 2 (r = 0.79; n = 252). Differences between ultrasonic and carcass measurements were expressed on both an actual (FDIFF and RDIFF) and absolute (FDEV and RDEV) basis. Mean FDIFF and RDIFF indicated that ultrasound underestimated CFAT by 0.06 cm and overestimated CLMA by 0.71 cm2 across both years. Overall mean FDEV and RDEV, which are indications of the average error rate, were 0.16 cm and 3.39 cm2, respectively. Analysis of year effects revealed that FDIFF, FDEV, and RDEV were greater (P < 0.01) in magnitude in yr 1. Further analysis of FDEV indicated that leaner (CFAT < 0.51 cm) cattle were overestimated and that fatter (CFAT > 1.02 cm) cattle were underestimated with ultrasound. Similarly, steers with small CLMA (<71.0 cm2) were overestimated, and steers with large CLMA (>90.3 cm2) were underestimated. The thickness of CFAT had an effect (P < 0.05) on the error of UFAT and ULMA measurements, with leaner animals being more accurately evaluated for both traits. Standard errors of prediction (SEP) adjusted for bias of ultrasound measurements were 0.20 cm and 4.49 cm2 for UFAT and ULMA, respectively. Differences in SEP were observed for ULMA, but not UFAT, by year. These results indicate that ultrasound can be an accurate estimator of carcass traits in live cattle when measurements are taken by an experienced, well-trained technician, with only small differences in accuracy between years.
Key Words: Accuracy • Beef Cattle • Carcass Composition • Ultrasound
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Theriault, C. Pomar, and F. W. Castonguay Accuracy of real-time ultrasound measurements of total tissue, fat, and muscle depths at different measuring sites in lamb J Anim Sci, May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1801 - 1813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. D. Leeds, M. R. Mousel, D. R. Notter, H. N. Zerby, C. A. Moffet, and G. S. Lewis B-mode, real-time ultrasound for estimating carcass measures in live sheep: Accuracy of ultrasound measures and their relationships with carcass yield and value J Anim Sci, November 1, 2008; 86(11): 3203 - 3214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Teixeira, M. Joy, and R. Delfa In vivo estimation of goat carcass composition and body fat partition by real-time ultrasonography J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2369 - 2376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. R. B. Ribeiro, L. O. Tedeschi, J. R. Stouffer, and G. E. Carstens Technical note: A novel technique to assess internal body fat of cattle by using real-time ultrasound J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(3): 763 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. R. Smith, S. K. Duckett, M. J. Azain, R. N. Sonon Jr., and T. D. Pringle The effect of anabolic implants on intramuscular lipid deposition in finished beef cattle J Anim Sci, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 430 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Silva, J. J. Afonso, V. A. Santos, A. Monteiro, C. M. Guedes, J. M. T. Azevedo, and A. Dias-da-Silva In vivo estimation of sheep carcass composition using real-time ultrasound with two probes of 5 and 7.5 MHz and image analysis J Anim Sci, December 1, 2006; 84(12): 3433 - 3439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U. J. Schroder and R. Staufenbiel Invited Review: Methods to Determine Body Fat Reserves in the Dairy Cow with Special Regard to Ultrasonographic Measurement of Backfat Thickness J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 1 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. B. Wall, G. H. Rouse, D. E. Wilson, R. G. Tait Jr., and W. D. Busby Use of ultrasound to predict body composition changes in steers at 100 and 65 days before slaughter J Anim Sci, June 1, 2004; 82(6): 1621 - 1629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Greiner, G. H. Rouse, D. E. Wilson, L. V. Cundiff, and T. L. Wheeler Prediction of retail product weight and percentage using ultrasound and carcass measurements in beef cattle J Anim Sci, July 1, 2003; 81(7): 1736 - 1742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
