J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Teichert, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Teichert, B.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:563-570
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Supplementation to meet metabolizable protein requirements of primiparous beef heifers: II. Pregnancy and economics1

H. H. Patterson2, D. C. Adams3, T. J. Klopfenstein, R. T. Clark and B. Teichert

Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908

3 Correspondence:
Univ. of Neb. West. Central Research and Extension Center; Rt. 4, Box 46 A; North Platte, NE 69101.

Metabolizable protein (MP) requirements of spring calving heifers increase over the winter due to advancing gestation. The MP content of grazed winter forage is low, which may result in an MP deficiency. The objective was to compare the response of supplementing pregnant yearling heifers to meet MP requirements versus conventional CP supplementation. In 1997–98 and in 1998–99, pregnant, March-calving heifers (2,120 animals; 358 kg) at two locations of a commercial ranch in the Nebraska Sandhills, were used following breeding through calving as 2-yr-olds (cows). Heifers were randomly allotted to one of two supplementation treatments (about 265 heifers/treatment) each year at each of two locations (Ashby and Whitman, NE). Treatments were 1) supplementation to meet MP requirements (MPR) or 2) supplementation to meet CP requirements (CPR). Heifers grazed upland range and meadow and were offered supplements three times weekly from mid-September to mid- or late-February. Increasing amounts of meadow hay were fed from mid-December through calving. After supplementation ended in February, heifers were managed in one group at each location until the following October. Body weights and body condition scores were taken in September, February, and October. Two-yr-old pregnancy rates were determined via rectal palpation in October. Capital budgeting techniques were used to determine the economic return of supplementation strategies. There were no differences in BW (P = 0.41) or body condition score (P = 0.99) change during the winter among treatment groups across years and locations, but MPR cows were heavier (425 kg) than CPR cows (421 kg) at the time of 2-yr-old pregnancy testing (P = 0.07). Pregnancy rate was higher (P = 0.001) in the MPR (91%) compared to the CPR treatment (86%). Regression analysis showed that the response of the MPR treatment on pregancy rates tended to be negatively correlated with precalving body condition score (P = 0.11), body condition score loss over the winter (P = 0.07), and body condition score at weaning of the first calf (P = 0.08). The improvement in 2-yr-old pregnancy by supplementing to meet MP requirements improved the value of each bred heifer by $13.64. We conclude that balancing MP requirements during gestation may result in a subsequent increase in 2-yr-old pregnancy and increase the value of young females.

Key Words: Cows • Heifers • Pregnancy • Profitability • Protein




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
L. A. Stalker, D. C. Adams, and T. J. Klopfenstein
Influence of Distillers Dried Grain Supplementation Frequency on Forage Digestibility and Growth Performance of Beef Cattle
Professional Animal Scientist, June 1, 2009; 25(3): 289 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. L. Engel, H. H. Patterson, and G. A. Perry
Effect of dried corn distillers grains plus solubles compared with soybean hulls, in late gestation heifer diets, on animal and reproductive performance
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2008; 86(7): 1697 - 1708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. Driskill, J. R. Russell, D. R. Strohbehn, D. G. Morrical, S. K. Barnhart, and J. D. Lawrence
Effects of stocking rate and corn gluten feed supplementation on performance of young beef cows grazing winter-stockpiled tall fescue-red clover pasture
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1577 - 1586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. C. Waterman, C. A. Loest, W. D. Bryant, and M. K. Petersen
Supplemental methionine and urea for gestating beef cows consuming low quality forage diets
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 731 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. Wu, F. W. Bazer, J. M. Wallace, and T. E. Spencer
BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Intrauterine growth retardation: Implications for the animal sciences
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2316 - 2337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.