J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Lange, C. F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Birkett, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by de Lange, C. F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Birkett, S. H.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:E159-E165
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Modeling chemical and physical body composition of the growing pig

C. F. M. de Lange*,1, P. C. H. Morel{dagger} and S. H. Birkett*

* Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1 and and {dagger} Institute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

1 Correspondence: phone: 519-824-4120 ext. 56477; fax: 519-836-9873; E-mail: cdelange{at}uoguelph.ca.

In pig growth models, masses of body lipid (L) and body protein (P) are key state variables that can be related quantitatively to chemical and physical body composition for predicting growth response and carcass characteristics. The main chemical constituents in the empty body weight (EBW) are water (Wa), L, P, and ash. Within pig genotypes, Wa is independent of L and closely related to P (e.g., Wa = a x Pb). The scaling parameter (b) is remarkably constant across pig types, at about 0.855, and represents changes in distribution of P with increasing EBW and differences in Wa-to-P ratios among body pools. The parameter "a" ranges between 4.90 and 5.62 and seems to vary with pig genotype. The ash-to-P ratio, about 0.20, has little significance on estimates of EBW. Gut fill, the difference between live body weight (LBW) and EBW, ranges between 0.03 and 0.10 of LBW; it varies with LBW, feeding level, diet characteristics, and time off-feed. The distribution of P and L over the main physical body components (dissectible muscle and fat, viscera, blood, bone, integument) varies considerably among groups of pigs and appears influenced by EBW, pig genotype, feeding level, diet characteristics, and possibly thermal environment and health status. Except for extreme pig genotypes, the distribution of lean over the main carcass cuts is relatively constant; however, little is known about the observed variation in the distribution of L over body fat depots. Representing dynamic effects of animal and external factors on sizes of physical body components is an apparent weakness in pig growth models, further complicated by inconsistencies in defining some of the physical body components, and dissectible lean tissue in particular. Improved accuracy in representing physical body composition will provide more insight on manipulation of carcass value and efficiencies of converting diet nutrients into pork products.

Key Words: Body Composition • Chemical Composition • Growth Models • Physical Properties • Pigs




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. G. Wiseman, D. C. Mahan, and N. R. St-Pierre
Mineral composition of two genetic lines of barrows and gilts from twenty to one hundred twenty-five kilograms of body weight
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2009; 87(7): 2306 - 2314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. R. Giles, G. J. Eamens, P. F. Arthur, I. M. Barchia, K. J. James, and R. D. Taylor
Differential growth and development of pigs as assessed by X-ray computed tomography
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1648 - 1658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
H. R. Martinez-Ramirez, E. A. Jeaurond, and C. F. M. de Lange
Dynamics of body protein deposition and changes in body composition after sudden changes in amino acid intake: I. Barrows
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2156 - 2167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
H. R. Martinez-Ramirez, E. A. Jeaurond, and C. F. M. de Lange
Dynamics of body protein deposition and changes in body composition after sudden changes in amino acid intake: II. Entire male pigs
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2168 - 2179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
A. P. Schinckel, D. C. Mahan, T. G. Wiseman, and M. E. Einstein
Impact of Alternative Energy Systems on the Estimated Feed Requirements of Pigs with Varying Lean and Fat Tissue Growth Rates When Fed Corn and Soybean Meal-Based Diets
Professional Animal Scientist, June 1, 2008; 24(3): 198 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. P. Schinckel, D. C. Mahan, T. G. Wiseman, and M. E. Einstein
Growth of protein, moisture, lipid, and ash of two genetic lines of barrows and gilts from twenty to one hundred twenty-five kilograms of body weight
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 460 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
R. D. Stevenson and W. A. Woods Jr
Condition indices for conservation: new uses for evolving tools
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2006; 46(6): 1169 - 1190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.