J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forbes, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Forbes, J. M.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:E139-E144
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

The multifactorial nature of food intake control1

J. M. Forbes

University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.

2 Correspondence: Centre for Animal Sciences (phone +44-0-113-3433066; fax: +44-0-113-3433144; E-mail: j.m.forbes{at}leeds.ac.uk).

Three approaches to predicting and understanding food intake by beef cattle are discussed and compared. Although many physiological factors are known to be involved in intake control, these are not sufficiently quantifiable to form an adequate basis for intake prediction. Prediction equations derived from observed effects of animal and feed factors on intake are useful within the range of conditions under which the data were collected, but they do not predict adequately outside this range. The concept of an intermediate approach to intake prediction and understanding is presented, suggesting that proportional deviations of resource supplies from the feed (e.g., energy, protein, fiber) from the animal’s optimal supply ("requirement") generate discomforts. These, when squared and added, yield a total discomfort signal, which the animal minimizes. The fact that feed intakes by individual animals fluctuate considerably from day to day provides a means whereby animals can assess whether an intake somewhat higher or lower than their current average intake will improve their well-being. Examination of intake data from beef cattle fed grass silage suggests that intake is controlled over a period of several days. It is concluded that different levels of understanding of the control of voluntary intake are needed for different reasons, and that no single approach will serve all purposes.

Key Words: Beef Cattle • Physiology • Prediction • Voluntary Intake




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
L. E. Davis Rincker, M. S. Weber Nielsen, L. T. Chapin, J. S. Liesman, and M. J. VandeHaar
Effects of Feeding Prepubertal Heifers a High-Energy Diet for Three, Six, or Twelve Weeks on Feed Intake, Body Growth, and Fat Deposition
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 1913 - 1925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Seo, C. Lanzas, L. O. Tedeschi, and D. G. Fox
Development of a Mechanistic Model to Represent the Dynamics of Liquid Flow Out of the Rumen and to Predict the Rate of Passage of Liquid in Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 840 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.