J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choat, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Goad, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choat, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Goad, C. L.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:3191-3201
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Influence of grazing dormant native range or winter wheat pasture on subsequent finishing cattle performance, carcass characteristics, and ruminal metabolism1,2

W. T. Choat*, C. R. Krehbiel*,3, G. C. Duff{dagger},4, R. E. Kirksey{ddagger}, L. M. Lauriault{ddagger}, J. D. Rivera{dagger}, B. M. Capitan§, D. A. Walker{dagger}, G. B. Donart§ and C. L. Goad

* Departments of Animal Science and and § Statistics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078; and {dagger} Clayton Livestock Research Center, Clayton, NM 88415; and {ddagger} Agricultural Science Center, Tucumcari, NM 88401; and and Department of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003

3 Correspondence: 208 Anim. Sci. Bldg. (phone: 405-744-8857; fax: 405-744-7390; E-mail: kclinto{at}okstate.edu).

A winter grazing/feedlot performance experiment repeated over 2 yr (Exp. 1) and a metabolism experiment (Exp. 2) were conducted to evaluate effects of grazing dormant native range or irrigated winter wheat pasture on subsequent intake, feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, total-tract digestion of nutrients, and ruminal digesta kinetics in beef cattle. In Exp. 1, 30 (yr 1) or 67 (yr 2) English crossbred steers that had previously grazed native range (n = 38) or winter wheat (n = 59) for approximately 180 d were allotted randomly within previous treatment to feedlot pens (yr 1 native range = three pens [seven steers/pen], winter wheat = two pens [eight steers/pen]; yr 2 native range = three pens [eight steers/pen], winter wheat = four pens [10 or 11 steers/pen]). As expected, winter wheat steers had greater (P < 0.01) ADG while grazing than did native range steers. In contrast, feedlot ADG and gain efficiency were greater (P < 0.02) for native range steers than for winter wheat steers. Hot carcass weight, longissimus muscle area, and marbling score were greater (P < 0.01) for winter wheat steers than for native range steers. In contrast, 12th-rib fat depth (P < 0.64) and yield grade (P < 0.77) did not differ among treatments. In Exp. 2, eight ruminally cannulated steers that had previously grazed winter wheat (n = 4; initial BW = 407 ± 12 kg) or native range (n = 4; initial BW = 293 ± 23 kg) were used to determine intake, digesta kinetics, and total-tract digestion while being adapted to a 90% concentrate diet. The adaptation and diets used in Exp. 2 were consistent with those used in Exp. 1 and consisted of 70, 75, 80, and 85% concentrate diets, each fed for 5 d. As was similar for intact steers, restricted growth of cannulated native range steers during the winter grazing phase resulted in greater (P < 0.001) DMI (% of BW) and ADG (P < 0.04) compared with winter wheat steers. In addition, ruminal fill (P < 0.01) and total-tract OM digestibility (P < 0.02) were greater for native range than for winter wheat steers across the adaptation period. Greater digestibility by native range steers early in the finishing period might account for some of the compensatory gain response. Although greater performance was achieved by native range steers in the feedlot, grazing winter wheat before finishing resulted in fewer days on feed, increased hot carcass weight, and improved carcass merit.

Key Words: Carcass Quality • Cattle • Digestibility • Range Pastures • Winter Wheat




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
W. A. Phillips and G. W. Horn
Intake and digestion of wheat forage by stocker calves and lambs
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2424 - 2429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
S. J. Winterholler, D. L. Lalman, M. D. Hudson, C. E. Ward, C. R. Krehbiel, and G. W. Horn
Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Economic Analysis of Calf-Fed and Wheat Pasture Yearling Systems in the Southern Great Plains
Professional Animal Scientist, June 1, 2008; 24(3): 232 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. A. Chabot, C. D. Chabot, L. K. Conway, and S. A. Soto-Navarro
Effect of fat supplementation and wheat pasture maturity on forage intake and digestion characteristics of steers grazing wheat pasture
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2008; 86(5): 1263 - 1270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. P. S. Neel, J. P. Fontenot, W. M. Clapham, S. K. Duckett, E. E. D. Felton, G. Scaglia, and W. B. Bryan
Effects of winter stocker growth rate and finishing system on: I. Animal performance and carcass characteristics
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 2012 - 2018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. D. Rhoades, J. E. Sawyer, K. Y. Chung, M. L. Schell, D. K. Lunt, and S. B. Smith
Effect of dietary energy source on in vitro substrate utilization and insulin sensitivity of muscle and adipose tissues of Angus and Wagyu steers
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2007; 85(7): 1719 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.