HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mills, J. A. N. Articles by France, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mills, J. A. N. Articles by France, J.

Alternative approaches to predicting methane emissions from dairy cows¹

J. A. N. Mills^*,2, E. Kebreab^,*, C. M. Yates^*, L. A. Crompton^*, S. B. Cammell^*, M. S. Dhanoa, R. E. Agnew and J. France

^* The University of Reading, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR, United Kingdom; and Institute for Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3EB, United Kingdom; and Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland; and and Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G2W1 Canada

² Correspondence—phone +44 (0) 1189 316783; E-mail: j.a.n.mills{at}reading.ac.uk.

Previous attempts to apply statistical models, which correlate nutrient intake with methane production, have been of limited value where predictions are obtained for nutrient intakes and diet types outside those used in model construction. Dynamic mechanistic models have proved more suitable for extrapolation, but they remain computationally expensive and are not applied easily in practical situations. The first objective of this research focused on employing conventional techniques to generate statistical models of methane production appropriate to United Kingdom dairy systems. The second objective was to evaluate these models and a model published previously using both United Kingdom and North American data sets. Thirdly, nonlinear models were considered as alternatives to the conventional linear regressions. The United Kingdom calorimetry data used to construct the linear models also were used to develop the three nonlinear alternatives that were all of modified Mitscherlich (monomolecular) form. Of the linear models tested, an equation from the literature proved most reliable across the full range of evaluation data (root mean square prediction error = 21.3%). However, the Mitscherlich models demonstrated the greatest degree of adaptability across diet types and intake level. The most successful model for simulating the independent data was a modified Mitscherlich equation with the steepness parameter set to represent dietary starch-to-ADF ratio (root mean square prediction error = 20.6%). However, when such data were unavailable, simpler Mitscherlich forms relating dry matter or metabolizable energy intake to methane production remained better alternatives relative to their linear counterparts.

Key Words: Dairy Cows • Methane • Modeling

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. I. Borucki Castro, L. E. Phillip, H. Lapierre, P. W. Jardon, and R. Berthiaume The Relative Merit of Ruminal Undegradable Protein from Soybean Meal or Soluble Fiber from Beet Pulp to Improve Nitrogen Utilization in Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2008; 91(10): 3947 - 3957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Ellis, E. Kebreab, N. E. Odongo, B. W. McBride, E. K. Okine, and J. France Prediction of Methane Production from Dairy and Beef Cattle J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3456 - 3466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]