J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barham, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barham, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. F.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:3052-3056
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Effects of growth implants on consumer perceptions of meat tenderness in beef steers1

B. L. Barham2, J. C. Brooks2, J. R. Blanton, Jr.2, A. D. Herring3, M. A. Carr4, C. R. Kerth5 and M. F. Miller6

Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409-2162

6 Correspondence: P.O. Box 42162 (phone: 806-742-2804; fax: 806-742-0169; E-mail: mfmrraider{at}aol.com).

Anabolic steroid implants are routinely used to increase growth performance and profitability; however, there are concerns that the use of implants, particularly those containing trenbolone acetate, may have detrimental effects on carcass quality and beef tenderness. Thus, the objectives of the current study were to determine the effects of various commonly used implant regimens on shear force values, sensory properties, and consumer satisfaction of beef top loin steaks from cattle of Bos indicus influence. Cattle were supplied by producers that agreed to provide sire and dam information in exchange for carcass and sensory data. Steers (n = 2,748) were assigned randomly to one of three implant treatments (12/sire; four steers from each sire were placed into each treatment group): 1) unimplanted controls (n = 1,368); 2) Synovex-S followed by another Synovex-S (n = 660); or 3) Synovex-S followed by Revalor-S (n = 720). Steaks sampled after 3, 7, and 14 d of aging indicated that unimplanted cattle had lower (P < 0.05) Warner-Bratzler Shear force values than those from implanted animals. No differences (P > 0.05) in shear force values were found between the two treatments or the control groups for steaks sampled following a 21-d aging period. Steaks from implanted animals sampled after 3, 7, and 14 d aging were rated lower (P < 0.05) for initial and sustained trained sensory panel tenderness scores. Consumers failed to detect any differences in steak samples related to implant treatment after 7 and 14 d of aging. Consumer education level and family income did not affect overall acceptability (P > 0.10 and 0.18, respectively) or tenderness acceptability (P > 0.11 and 0.68, respectively); however, consumers with postgraduate degrees recorded lower (P < 0.05) overall quality, beef flavor, juiciness, and tenderness scores than consumers in all other education classifications. Additionally, family income had no effect on overall quality (P > 0.21), beef flavor (P > 0.28), juiciness (P > 0.58), or tenderness (P > 0.45) scores. Results indicate that using a moderate implant program in Bos indicus-influenced cattle has no detrimental effects on beef tenderness and consumer acceptability.

Key Words: Beef • Bos indicus • Growth Implants • Palatability • Tenderness




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. D. Kellermeier, A. W. Tittor, J. C. Brooks, M. L. Galyean, D. A. Yates, J. P. Hutcheson, W. T. Nichols, M. N. Streeter, B. J. Johnson, and M. F. Miller
Effects of zilpaterol hydrochloride with or without an estrogen-trenbolone acetate terminal implant on carcass traits, retail cutout, tenderness, and muscle fiber diameter in finishing steers
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2009; 87(11): 3702 - 3711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. A. Boles, D. L. Boss, K. I. Neary, K. C. Davis, and M. W. Tess
Growth implants reduced tenderness of steaks from steers and heifers with different genetic potentials for growth and marbling
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2009; 87(1): 269 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. Faucitano, P. Y. Chouinard, J. Fortin, I. B. Mandell, C. Lafreniere, C. L. Girard, and R. Berthiaume
Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 2. Meat quality, fatty acid composition, and overall palatability
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2008; 86(7): 1678 - 1689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. R. Smith, S. K. Duckett, M. J. Azain, R. N. Sonon Jr., and T. D. Pringle
The effect of anabolic implants on intramuscular lipid deposition in finished beef cattle
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 430 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.