J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nissen, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Oksbjerg, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nissen, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Oksbjerg, N.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:3018-3027
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Increased maternal nutrition of sows has no beneficial effects on muscle fiber number or postnatal growth and has no impact on the meat quality of the offspring1

P. M. Nissen*,2, V. O. Danielsen{dagger}, P. F. Jorgensen{ddagger} and N. Oksbjerg*

* Department of Food Science and and {dagger} Department of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Tjele, Denmark, and and {ddagger} Department of Anatomy and Physiology, the Royal Veterinaryand Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark

2 Correspondence: Research Centre Foulum, P.O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele (phone: +45 89991279; fax: +45 89991564; E-mail: piam.nissen{at}agrsci.dk).

The objective of this study was to examine how increased feed intake of the sow during early to mid-gestation affects sow performance and the muscle fiber number, performance, and technological meat quality of the offspring. Thirty-nine pregnant sows (Landrace x Large White sows mated to Landrace or Large White boars) in their fourth parity were assigned to one of three treatments: 1) the sows were either fed restrictively (control = 15 MJ of NE/d from d 1 to 90, then 24 MJ of NE/d from d 91 to 112, and again 15 MJ of NE/d from d 113 to 115 of gestation); 2) fed ad libitum from d 25 to 50 (A25–50); or 3) ad libitum from d 25 to 70 (A25–70) and as control in the remaining periods. The offspring were weaned at 4 wk of age and had free access to feed from 2 wk of age until slaughter. They were slaughtered litterwise at an average body weight of 104 ± 14 kg. Estimates for total, primary (P-), and secondary (S-) muscle fiber number; muscle fiber area; and DNA and RNA content were analyzed in semitendinosus muscle (ST) samples from the heaviest, middle, and lightest weight (LW) pigs of each sex within litter selected at slaughter. Technological meat quality traits (pH at 24 h postmortem, drip loss, Minolta color, and pigment) were analyzed in longissimus dorsi muscle. Fiber number, fiber area, and concentrations and content of DNA and RNA of the offspring were not significantly affected by increased maternal nutrition. The ST muscle weight was lower in offspring from A25–50 than control sows (P = 0.019). Average daily gain, carcass weight, and the muscle deposition rate also were numerically lower for A25–50 than control and A25–70 pigs. An interaction between treatment and pig weight was found for muscle deposition rate (P = 0.006), in that LW pigs from treatment A25–50 had a lower deposition rate than LW pigs from control. We found no effect of treatment on the meat quality traits in the offspring. Also, barrows had a higher (P < 0.05) number of P-fibers, higher daily gain, and carcass weight than female pigs. No differences were found on any meat quality traits between sexes. Thus, ad libitum feeding of pregnant sows from d 25 to 50 or d 25 to 70 of gestation did not have any beneficial effect on muscle fiber number and area in the offspring. It seems that maternal ad libitum feeding from d 25 to 50 in gestation had a negative effect on postnatal muscle growth, with especially the LW pigs being affected.

Key Words: Growth • Maternal Nutrition • Meat Quality • Muscle Fiber • Pig




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. J. Zhu, B. Han, J. Tong, C. Ma, J. M. Kimzey, K. R. Underwood, Y. Xiao, B. W. Hess, S. P. Ford, P. W. Nathanielsz, et al.
AMP-activated protein kinase signalling pathways are down regulated and skeletal muscle development impaired in fetuses of obese, over-nourished sheep
J. Physiol., May 15, 2008; 586(10): 2651 - 2664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. Wu, F. W. Bazer, J. M. Wallace, and T. E. Spencer
BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Intrauterine growth retardation: Implications for the animal sciences
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2316 - 2337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. J. Zhu, S. P. Ford, W. J. Means, B. W. Hess, P. W. Nathanielsz, and M. Du
Maternal nutrient restriction affects properties of skeletal muscle in offspring
J. Physiol., August 15, 2006; 575(1): 241 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. Rehfeldt and G. Kuhn
Consequences of birth weight for postnatal growth performance and carcass quality in pigs as related to myogenesis
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(13_suppl): E113 - E.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M.-J. Zhu, S. P. Ford, P. W. Nathanielsz, and M. Du
Effect of Maternal Nutrient Restriction in Sheep on the Development of Fetal Skeletal Muscle
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2004; 71(6): 1968 - 1973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. E. Musser, D. L. Davis, S. S. Dritz, M. D. Tokach, J. L. Nelssen, J. E. Minton, and R. D. Goodband
Conceptus and maternal responses to increased feed intake during early gestation in pigs
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2004; 82(11): 3154 - 3161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
P. M. Nissen, P. F. Jorgensen, and N. Oksbjerg
Within-litter variation in muscle fiber characteristics, pig performance, and meat quality traits
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2004; 82(2): 414 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.