J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pruzzo, L.
Right arrow Articles by Fioretti, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pruzzo, L.
Right arrow Articles by Fioretti, C. C.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:2984-2988
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Risk-adjusted expected return for selection decisions1

L. Pruzzo*,2, R. J. C. Cantet*,{dagger} and C. C. Fioretti{ddagger}

* Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and {dagger} Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), C1033AAJ Buenos Aires, Argentina; and and {ddagger} Estancias y Cabaña Las Lilas, C1107AAL Buenos Aires, Argentina

2 Correspondence: Av. San Martín 4453, C1417DSQ (phone: 54-011-4524-8000, ext. 8191; fax: 54-011-4514-8735; E-mail: lpruzzo{at}agro.uba.ar).

The results of genetic evaluation are predictions of breeding values for the selection candidates, and these involve uncertainty with regard to future returns from the use of those selected individuals. This uncertainty is due to differential variability in BLUP of breeding values and can be translated into risk: High fluctuations mean greater risk, which is not taken into account by just looking at expected return. In this research, the methodology of value at risk (VaR) and expected shortfall is introduced for animal breeding decisions as a means to adjust the expected return for the cost of uncertainty in prediction of breeding values. This methodology has recently received a great deal of attention from financial institutions. Given a specified probability {alpha}, VaR is the {alpha}-quantile of the distribution of economic returns. The conditional value at risk (CVaR), or expected shortfall, is the expectation of the economic returns, which are less or equal to the VaR. By subtracting the CVaR from the predicted aggregate genotype (µR), a risk-adjusted expected return (RAER) measure was obtained. The measures µR, VaR, and RAER were calculated for a data set with progeny of 161 Polled Hereford bulls belonging to a beef cattle company. The Pearson and Spearman correlations between µR and RAER were 0.89 (P < 0.001) and 0.90 (P < 0.001), respectively. Even though the latter correlation was high, some bulls ranked differently for µR compared with RAER. The Pearson correlation between µR and VaR was low (0.124) and nonsignificant (P > 0.05), whereas the correlation between VaR and RAER was -0.31 (P < 0.0001). The results indicate the need to take into account the adjustment for risk in expected return in order to alleviate the effects of possible losses when overrated animals are selected.

Key Words: Errors • Genetic Improvement • Prediction • Returns • Risk






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.