J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, M. S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Bergfeld, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, M. S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Bergfeld, E.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:2908-2911
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Critical perspectives in animal agriculture: A response

M. S. Weber Nielsen*,1 and E. Bergfeld{dagger}

* Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824 and and {dagger} American Society of Animal Science, Savoy, IL 61874

1 Correspondence: 1250E Anthony Hall (phone: 517-432-5443; fax: 517-353-1699; E-mail: msw{at}msu.edu).

People who work in the animal industries are faced with questions and criticisms about a variety of contentious issues, including animal management practices, ethics, diversity in animal agriculture, and animal welfare. Formulating responses to these questions requires a critical evaluation of our own work and open discussion of these controversial issues. Effective debate on these issues can be accomplished only with input from philosophers and social scientists skilled in such discussions, in addition to animal scientists. Therefore, animal scientists must engage in discussions of controversial issues among themselves and with entities outside agriculture. Furthermore, we must accept responsibility for the application of research results and any potential negative consequences. Because society is increasingly concerned with issues of animal welfare and the effects of new technologies, we should increase communications and transparency with the public. Increased diversity of race and gender will increase the ability of animal agriculture to connect with our stakeholders and to communicate the relevance of our work to society. Animal scientists need a professional ethic that espouses a higher level of understanding and commitment to philosophical discussions of contentious issues.

Key Words: Animal Production • Ethics • Society




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
K. K. Schillo
Critical perspectives of animal agriculture: Introduction
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2003; 81(11): 2880 - 2886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.