J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cuomo, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cuomo, C.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:2904-2907
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Science, values, and common ground1

Chris Cuomo2

Department of Philosophy, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221

2 Correspondence: Mail Location 374 (E-mail: cuomocj{at}email.uc.edu).

In this paper, I argue that there may be common ground shared by animal science and its critics insofar as animal scientists seek improvement in their field in four areas: the quality of their products, the quality of life for those who make their livelihood in food production, the fair treatment of human workers, and the humane treatment of animals. I also propose that there are fundamental differences between improvement motivated by profit and improvement motivated by ethical values. Positive moral change is sometimes revolutionary, although it is often a matter of promoting positive incremental changes and keeping one’s attention on the effects of actions and attitudes. In conclusion, I suggest that in animal agriculture, positive change can be brought about by "getting closer" to the objects of scientific research, including nonhuman animals, by paying more attention to their welfare.

Key Words: Contemporary Issues • Ethics • Values




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
C. C. Croney and R. D. Reynnells
The Ethics of Semantics: Do We Clarify or Obfuscate Reality to Influence Perceptions of Farm Animal Production?
Poult. Sci., February 1, 2008; 87(2): 387 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. K. Schillo
Critical perspectives of animal agriculture: Introduction
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2003; 81(11): 2880 - 2886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. S. W. Nielsen and E. Bergfeld
Critical perspectives in animal agriculture: A response
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2003; 81(11): 2908 - 2911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.