J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moseley, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lauderdale, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moseley, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lauderdale, J. W.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:2699-2703
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

A dose-response study of melengestrol acetate on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of beef steers1

W. M. Moseley2, D. M. Meeuwse, J. F. Boucher, K. J. Dame and J. W. Lauderdale

Pfizer, Inc., Veterinary Medicine Research and Development, Kalamazoo, MI 49001

2 Correspondence: 7000 Portage Rd. (phone: 269-833-2423; fax: 269-833-3246; E-mail: william.m.moseley{at}pfizer.com).

The dose response of melengestrol acetate (MGA) on ADG (kg/d) and gain efficiency (gain/DMI, g/kg) was estimated in beef steers fed a finishing diet under commercial feedlot conditions. Melengestrol acetate is not approved for use in steers as a feed additive. The study design was five blocks of four pens (each pen was assigned a dose of MGA) with 166 to 200 steers per pen. Melengestrol acetate was fed to steers at 0 (n = 899, five pens), 0.1 (n = 900, five pens), 0.2 (n = 899, five pens), and 0.4 (n = 900, five pens) mg of MGA/steer daily. Pens within a block were slaughtered on the same day. Blocks 1 through 5 were fed MGA for 123, 122, 116, 124, and 138 d, respectively. The experimental unit was a pen of steers, and blocking was based on source of steers. The ADG was 1.81, 1.85, 1.80, and 1.83 kg/d for steers fed 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg MGA per day, respectively. For ADG, the dose was significant, but neither linear nor quadratic effects were significant. Compared with steers of the control group, ADG was greater for steers fed 0.1 mg MGA (P < 0.01). Feed efficiencies were 170, 173, 171, and 172 g/kg for steers fed 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg MGA/d, respectively; however, no effects of dose (P = 0.19) or linear (P = 0.21) or quadratic (P > 0.60) effects were observed. There was no evidence for either positive or negative effects of MGA on DMI, hot carcass weight, dressing percent, quality grade, yield grade, back fat thickness, marbling score, longissimus muscle area, and incidence of dark cutter carcasses in response to feeding MGA to steers at doses of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg daily. The incidence of buller behavior (0.43 to 1.11%) was low and did not permit an accurate test of the clinical observations that feeding MGA to steers decreases the occurrence of buller steers. Melengestrol acetate fed to finishing beef steers produced small improvements in growth performance (ADG, 2.2%) at the 0.1 mg MGA dose, but none of the doses examined produced improvement in carcass quality or yield grade measurements.

Key Words: Average Daily Gain • Gain Efficiency • Live Weight Gain • Melengestrol Acetate • Steers




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. K. Sissom, C. D. Reinhardt, and B. J. Johnson
Melengestrol acetate alters muscle cell proliferation in heifers and steers
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2006; 84(11): 2950 - 2958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.