J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacNeil, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacNeil, M. D.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:2425-2433
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Genetic evaluation of an index of birth weight and yearling weight to improve efficiency of beef production1,2

M. D. MacNeil3,4

USDA, ARS, Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory, Miles City, MT 59301

3 Correspondence: 243 Fort Keogh Rd. (phone: 406-232-8213; fax: 406-232-8209; E-mail: mike{at}larrl.ars.usda.gov).

The CGC population is a stabilized composite of 1/2 Red Angus, 1/4 Charolais, and 1/4 Tarentaise germplasm. The objectives of this research were to estimate genetic parameters for weight traits of CGC and to evaluate genetic responses resulting from selection based on the following index: I = 365-d weight - 3.2(birth weight). Phenotypes evaluated were birth weight (n = 5,083), 200-d weight (n = 4,902), 365-d weight (n = 4,626), and the index. In addition, there were 1,433 cows with at least one recorded weight, and 4,375 total observations of cow weight collected at the time their calves were weaned. In 1989, a randomly selected control line and a line selected for greater values of the index were established. Average generation intervals were 3.16 ± 0.04 and 3.90 ± 0.08 yr in the index and control lines, respectively. The index selection line (n = 950) accumulated approximately 212 kg more selection differential than the control line over three generations (n = 912). Heritability estimates for direct effects were 0.32 ± 0.04, 0.49 ± 0.05, 0.49 ± 0.05, 0.30 ± 0.04, and 0.70 ± 0.04 for the index, birth weight, 365-d weight, 200-d weight, and cow weight, respectively. Heritability estimates for maternal effects were 0.05 ± 0.02, 0.11 ± 0.03, 0.04 ± 0.02, and 0.19 ± 0.04 for the index, birth weight, 365-d weight, and 200-d weight, respectively. In the control line, direct genetic changes for the index and its components were small. For the index selection line, direct genetic changes for the index, birth weight, 365-d weight, 200-d weight, and cow weight were 6.0 ± 0.3, 0.45 ± 0.09, 7.74 ± 0.55, 3.42 ± 0.25, and 6.3 ± 0.9 kg/generation, respectively. Maternal genetic changes were generally small for both the control and index selection lines. Thus, selection for the index produced positive correlated responses for direct genetic effects on BW traits at all ages, with only minor effects on maternal genetic effects. Results demonstrate that despite a genetic antagonism that compromises selection response for decreased birth weight and increased postnatal growth, favorable genetic responses can be achieved with the selection index used in this study.

Key Words: Beef Cattle • Genetic Gain • Selection Index • Selection Responses




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. M. Melucci, A. N. Birchmeier, E. P. Cappa, and R. J. C. Cantet
Bayesian analysis of selection for greater weaning weight while maintaining birth weight in beef cattle
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2009; 87(10): 3089 - 3096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. M. Enns and G. B. Nicoll
Genetic change results from selection on an economic breeding objective in beef cattle
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2008; 86(12): 3348 - 3357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. L. Bennett, R. M. Thallman, W. M. Snelling, and L. A. Kuehn
Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. II. Phenotypic differences
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2103 - 2114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. L. Bennett
Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. I. Changes in estimated breeding values
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2093 - 2102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. G. Riley, S. W. Coleman, C. C. Chase Jr., T. A. Olson, and A. C. Hammond
Genetic parameters for body weight, hip height, and the ratio of weight to hip height from random regression analyses of Brahman feedlot cattle
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 42 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. D. MacNeil
Genetic evaluation of the ratio of calf weaning weight to cow weight
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 794 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.